• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经胆囊底优先入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术

Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Martin I G, Dexter S P, Marton J, Gibson J, Asker J, Firullo A, McMahon M J

机构信息

Leeds Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, Division of Surgery, General Infirmary at Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1995 Feb;9(2):203-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00191967.

DOI:10.1007/BF00191967
PMID:7597594
Abstract

Removal of the gallbladder with commencement of dissection at the fundus is well recognized as a safe technique during difficult "open" cholecystectomy because it minimizes the risks of damage to the structures in or around Calot's triangle. We report here the routine employment of liver retractors and fundus-first dissection during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as an alternative to techniques previously described. Retraction of the liver and "fundus-first" dissection was used in 53 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecytectomy. There were 16 male and 37 female patients. Seven were operations performed during an acute admission and 20 had moderate or severe adhesions involving the gallbladder. Thirteen patients had a preexisting abdominal incision. The procedure was successful in 52 patients (98%), but in one patient it was converted to open operation because of dense adhesions. Median duration of operation was 90 min (range 35-240 min). There was no mortality and two complications (persistent right upper quadrant pain for 2 weeks after operation and bile leakage from the gallbladder bed). The facility to retract the liver and carry out a fundus-first dissection extends techniques developed for "open" surgery into the laparoscopic arena. It offers the surgeon the safety and versatility during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that it confers during conventional open surgery.

摘要

在困难的“开放”胆囊切除术中,从胆囊底部开始解剖以切除胆囊是一种公认的安全技术,因为它可将损伤胆囊三角内或其周围结构的风险降至最低。我们在此报告在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中常规使用肝脏牵开器并采用先从底部开始解剖的方法,作为对先前描述技术的一种替代。在53例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中使用了肝脏牵开和“先从底部开始”解剖的方法。其中男性16例,女性37例。7例手术是在急性入院期间进行的,20例有涉及胆囊的中度或重度粘连。13例患者有既往腹部手术切口。52例患者手术成功(98%),但1例患者因粘连严重而转为开放手术。手术中位持续时间为90分钟(范围35 - 240分钟)。无死亡病例,有2例并发症(术后持续右上腹疼痛2周和胆囊床胆汁漏)。肝脏牵开及先从底部开始解剖的操作将为“开放”手术所开发的技术扩展到了腹腔镜领域。它为外科医生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中提供了与传统开放手术中相同的安全性和灵活性。

相似文献

1
Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.经胆囊底优先入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 1995 Feb;9(2):203-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00191967.
2
The "inside approach of the gallbladder" is an alternative to the classic Calot's triangle dissection for a safe operation in severe cholecystitis.“胆囊内入路”是一种替代经典的胆囊三角解剖的方法,用于安全地治疗严重胆囊炎。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2626-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0966-5. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
3
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in antegrade (prograde) technique].[顺行(头侧到足侧)技术的腹腔镜胆囊切除术]
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(6):498-500.
4
Antegrade cholecystectomy before ligating the elements. A technique that reduces complications.在结扎各结构之前进行顺行胆囊切除术。一种减少并发症的技术。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:162-164.
5
[A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of chronic cholelithiasis--a five-year experience].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗慢性胆石症的前瞻性评估——五年经验]
Med Pregl. 2011 Jan-Feb;64(1-2):77-83. doi: 10.2298/mpns1102077s.
6
Evaluation of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.先行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的评估。
JSLS. 2004 Jul-Sep;8(3):255-8.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a modified dome-down approach with conventional laparoscopic instruments.经改良的穹窿-down 入路单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,使用常规腹腔镜器械。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1153-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1985-6. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
8
Outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single incision with SPIDER surgical system are comparable to conventional multiport technique: one surgeon's experience.使用SPIDER手术系统单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的效果与传统多孔技术相当:一位外科医生的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4793-4799. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4809-x. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques with special care treatment in acute cholecystitis patients regardless of operation timing.腹腔镜胆囊切除术技术,对急性胆囊炎患者无论手术时机如何均进行特殊护理治疗。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Jun;59(116):1006-9. doi: 10.5754/hge10188.
10
Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy.腹腔镜逆行(先处理胆囊底部)胆囊切除术
BMC Surg. 2009 Dec 11;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Assessment Between the Fundus-First Technique and Standard Laparoscopic Technique in Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术中眼底优先技术与标准腹腔镜技术的比较评估
Cureus. 2024 Nov 30;16(11):e74842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74842. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Robotic-assisted approach for complex cholecystectomies.复杂胆囊切除术的机器人辅助方法。
Mini Invasive Surg. 2023;7. doi: 10.20517/2574-1225.2022.117. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
Is fundus first laparoscopic cholecystectomy a better option than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. Pre- and perioperative factors of importance.胆囊切除术中胆总管的意外损伤。术前和围手术期的重要因素。
Ann Surg. 1985 Mar;201(3):328-32.
2
Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.腹腔镜激光胆囊切除术。与小切口胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 1989;3(3):131-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00591357.
3
Injuries to common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间胆总管损伤
对于困难型胆囊切除术,经阴道腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比是否具有优势?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1797-1803. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01403-5. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的循证外科
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Aug 18;10:116-134. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.08.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.安全胆囊切除术多学会实践指南和预防胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的最新共识会议。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2827-2855. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07568-7. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Liver retraction techniques for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的肝脏牵拉技术
Surg Endosc. 2000 Mar;14(3):311. doi: 10.1007/s004640000063.
7
The clinical anatomy of cystic artery variations: a review of over 9800 cases.胆囊动脉变异的临床解剖学:对9800多例病例的回顾
Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Jul;38(5):529-39. doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1600-y. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
8
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术治疗重症胆囊炎
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):526-531. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4235-5. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
9
Fundus-first transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a cholangiogram: a feasibility study.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆道造影术:一项可行性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):954-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1240-6. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
10
Overcoming the difficulties in laparoscopic management of contracted gallbladders with gallstones: possible role of fundus-down approach.克服结石性缩胆囊腹腔镜处理困难:底入法的可能作用。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):284-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1175-y. Epub 2010 Jul 10.
BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1475. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1475.
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a hundred consecutive cases.
Ir Med J. 1991 Mar;84(1):12-4.
5
The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis.巴尔的摩市腹腔镜治疗急性胆囊炎的经验
Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):388-92. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90604-c.
6
The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.欧洲腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经验。
Am J Surg. 1991 Mar;161(3):385-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-b.
7
Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy.腹腔镜引导下胆囊切除术
Am J Surg. 1991 Jan;161(1):36-42; discussion 42-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90358-k.
8
Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures.
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Mar;1(1):2-7.
9
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-lap-cholecystectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized study].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术。一项前瞻性随机研究的结果]
Chirurg. 1992 Apr;63(4):291-5.
10
Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern.腹腔镜手术导致的胆管损伤。一个值得关注的问题。
Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):203-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00003.