McKenzie R, Tantisira B, Jackson D, Bach T, Riley T
Department of Anesthesiology, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 1995 Mar;7(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(94)00041-2.
To evaluate the antiemetic effectiveness and side effects of adding low-dose droperidol to morphine delivered via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device.
Randomized, double-blind, clinical study.
University-affiliated women's hospital.
60 healthy women, 18 to 60 years of age, who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with a standardized anesthetic regime.
After surgery, the control group (n = 20) had access via PCA to two cartridges, each containing morphine 1 mg/ml and saline 1 ml. The two treated groups (n = 20 each) had access via PCA to either droperidol 0.5 mg or droperidol 1 mg added to two cartridges containing morphine 1 mg/ml.
Preoperative data, including each patient's history of nausea and vomiting with and without previous anesthesia, motion sickness, smoking, and alcohol intake, and date of her last menstrual period, were obtained. All patients received a standardized anesthetic with droperidol 0.5 mg given at closure of the peritoneum. Among those patients who received droperidol added to morphine for their postoperative analgesic regimen, fewer required rescue antiemetic medication (p < 0.05, test of trend in proportions), and they had a lower incidence of vomiting (p < 0.05, test of trend in proportions), as well as a decrease in the number of times a rescue antiemetic was needed during the 24-hour postoperative period (linear trend, p = 0.013).
An intermittent intake of low-dose droperidol with morphine given via a PCA delivery system in two treatment groups gave evidence for a dose-response relation between the amount of droperidol added and the proportion of patients needing a rescue antiemetic. The same result applied to the proportion of patients having an emetic episode and the number of times a rescue antiemetic had to be administered. There was no evidence that the low dose of droperidol added to morphine delivered via a PCA device increased unwanted side effects.
评估在通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)装置给予吗啡时添加小剂量氟哌利多的止吐效果及副作用。
随机、双盲临床研究。
大学附属医院的妇产科医院。
60名年龄在18至60岁之间、接受了标准化麻醉方案下全腹子宫切除术的健康女性。
术后,对照组(n = 20)通过PCA可使用两个药盒,每个药盒含1mg/ml吗啡和1ml生理盐水。两个治疗组(每组n = 20)通过PCA可使用添加了0.5mg氟哌利多或1mg氟哌利多的两个含1mg/ml吗啡的药盒。
获取术前数据,包括每位患者有无既往麻醉史的恶心呕吐史、晕动病、吸烟及饮酒情况,以及末次月经日期。所有患者均接受标准化麻醉,在关腹时给予0.5mg氟哌利多。在术后镇痛方案中接受添加了氟哌利多的吗啡的患者中,需要急救止吐药物的患者较少(p < 0.05,比例趋势检验),呕吐发生率较低(p < 0.05,比例趋势检验),且术后24小时内需要急救止吐药物的次数减少(线性趋势,p = 0.013)。
两个治疗组中通过PCA给药系统间歇性给予小剂量氟哌利多与吗啡,表明添加的氟哌利多量与需要急救止吐药物的患者比例之间存在剂量反应关系。这一结果同样适用于发生呕吐的患者比例及必须给予急救止吐药物的次数。没有证据表明通过PCA装置给予吗啡时添加的小剂量氟哌利多会增加不良副作用。