• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助沟通的实验分析。

An experimental analysis of facilitated communication.

作者信息

Montee B B, Miltenberger R G, Wittrock D, Watkins N, Rheinberger A, Stackhaus J

机构信息

Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):189-200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-189.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-189
PMID:7601804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1279809/
Abstract

We evaluated the authorship of messages produced through facilitated communication by 7 adults with moderate or severe mental retardation and their facilitators. The clients had been reported to be communicating fluently through facilitated communication. We controlled the facilitators' access to information to be communicated in two evaluation formats, naming pictures and describing activities. In both formats we conducted three conditions: (a) the facilitator and client had access to the same information, (b) the facilitator did not have access to the picture or activity, and (c) the facilitator was given false information about the picture or activity. The results showed that the clients typed the correct answer only when the facilitator had access to the same information, never typed the correct answer when the facilitator had no information or false information, and typed the picture or activity presented to the facilitator when it was different from the one experienced by the client. These results provide unequivocal evidence for facilitator control of typing during facilitated communication.

摘要

我们评估了7名中度或重度智力障碍成年人及其协助者通过辅助沟通产生的信息的作者身份。据报道,这些客户通过辅助沟通能够流畅地进行交流。我们以两种评估形式控制协助者获取要交流的信息,即命名图片和描述活动。在这两种形式中,我们都设置了三种情况:(a) 协助者和客户获取相同的信息;(b) 协助者无法获取图片或活动信息;(c) 协助者被给予关于图片或活动的错误信息。结果显示,只有当协助者获取相同信息时,客户才会打出正确答案;当协助者没有信息或有错误信息时,客户从未打出正确答案;当呈现给协助者的图片或活动与客户所经历的不同时,客户打出的是呈现给协助者的图片或活动。这些结果为辅助沟通期间协助者对打字的控制提供了明确的证据。

相似文献

1
An experimental analysis of facilitated communication.辅助沟通的实验分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):189-200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-189.
2
An experimental assessment of facilitated communication.
Ment Retard. 1993 Feb;31(1):49-59.
3
Childhood sexual abuse reported by facilitated communication.
Pediatrics. 1993 Jun;91(6):1190-2.
4
Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication.
Ment Retard. 1996 Aug;34(4):231-42.
5
Defining facilitated communication in and out of existence: role of science in the facilitated communication controversy.
Ment Retard. 1994 Aug;32(4):307-11; discussion 317-8.
6
Negotiating the facilitated communication maze.
Ment Retard. 1994 Aug;32(4):305-7; discussion 317-8.
7
What if...: a plea to professionals to consider the risk-benefit ratio of facilitated communication.倘若……:呼吁专业人士考量辅助沟通的风险效益比。
Ment Retard. 1994 Aug;32(4):300-4; discussion 314-7.
8
Understanding distress in people with severe communication difficulties: developing and assessing the Disability Distress Assessment Tool (DisDAT).理解重度沟通障碍患者的痛苦:开发和评估残疾痛苦评估工具(DisDAT)。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007 Apr;51(Pt 4):277-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00875.x.
9
Facilitated communication and authorship: a systematic review.辅助沟通与作者身份:一项系统综述。
Augment Altern Commun. 2014 Dec;30(4):359-68. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.971490. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
Reliability and validity of the revised Triple C: Checklist of Communicative Competencies for adults with severe and multiple disabilities.修订版三C量表的信效度:重度和多重残疾成年人沟通能力检查表
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Jan;53(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01121.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Fuzzy Concept of Applied Behavior Analysis Research.应用行为分析研究的模糊概念
Behav Anal. 2017 May 15;40(1):123-159. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0093-x. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Autism spectrum disorder: Consensus guidelines on assessment, treatment and research from the British Association for Psychopharmacology.自闭症谱系障碍:英国精神药理学协会关于评估、治疗和研究的共识指南。
J Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jan;32(1):3-29. doi: 10.1177/0269881117741766. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Social Thinking®: Science, Pseudoscience, or Antiscience?社会思维®:科学、伪科学还是反科学?
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Jan 26;9(2):152-7. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0108-1. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Using behavior analysis to examine the outcomes of unproven therapies: an evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for children with autism.运用行为分析来检验未经证实的疗法的效果:对自闭症儿童高压氧治疗的评估。
Behav Anal Pract. 2008 Winter;1(2):50-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03391728.
5
Science, skepticism, and applied behavior analysis.科学、怀疑主义与应用行为分析。
Behav Anal Pract. 2008 Winter;1(2):42-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03391727.
6
Facilitated communication since 1995: a review of published studies.1995年以来的辅助沟通:已发表研究综述
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Jun;31(3):287-313. doi: 10.1023/a:1010795219886.
7
Brief report: Degree of facilitator influence in facilitated communication as a function of facilitator characteristics, attitudes, and beliefs.简短报告:辅助沟通中辅助者的影响程度与辅助者特征、态度及信念的关系
J Autism Dev Disord. 1998 Feb;28(1):87-90. doi: 10.1023/a:1026023321945.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief report: a case study assessing the validity of facilitated communication.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Mar;23(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01066425.
2
An experimental assessment of facilitated communication.
Ment Retard. 1993 Feb;31(1):49-59.
3
Brief report: facilitator-suggested conversational evaluation of facilitated communication.简短报告:促进交流的辅助者建议的对话评估
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Sep;23(3):541-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01046055.
4
Brief report: evaluation of eight case studies of facilitated communication.简短报告:对八项辅助沟通案例研究的评估
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Sep;23(3):531-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01046054.
5
Brief report: a multitask controlled evaluation of facilitated communication.简短报告:辅助沟通的多任务对照评估
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Jun;24(3):369-79. doi: 10.1007/BF02172234.
6
Facilitated communication: an experimental evaluation.辅助沟通:一项实验评估。
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Jun;24(3):345-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02172232.
7
A naturalistic approach to the validation of facilitated communication.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Oct;24(5):647-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02172144.
8
Issues raised by facilitated communication for theorizing and research on autism.辅助沟通引发的关于自闭症理论化及研究的问题。
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Dec;36(6):1108-19. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3606.1108.
9
Questions about facilitated communication and autism.关于辅助沟通与自闭症的问题。
J Autism Dev Disord. 1992 Sep;22(3):331-7; discussion 337-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01048237.