Suppr超能文献

An experimental analysis of facilitated communication.

作者信息

Montee B B, Miltenberger R G, Wittrock D, Watkins N, Rheinberger A, Stackhaus J

机构信息

Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):189-200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-189.

Abstract

We evaluated the authorship of messages produced through facilitated communication by 7 adults with moderate or severe mental retardation and their facilitators. The clients had been reported to be communicating fluently through facilitated communication. We controlled the facilitators' access to information to be communicated in two evaluation formats, naming pictures and describing activities. In both formats we conducted three conditions: (a) the facilitator and client had access to the same information, (b) the facilitator did not have access to the picture or activity, and (c) the facilitator was given false information about the picture or activity. The results showed that the clients typed the correct answer only when the facilitator had access to the same information, never typed the correct answer when the facilitator had no information or false information, and typed the picture or activity presented to the facilitator when it was different from the one experienced by the client. These results provide unequivocal evidence for facilitator control of typing during facilitated communication.

摘要

相似文献

1
An experimental analysis of facilitated communication.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):189-200. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-189.
6
Negotiating the facilitated communication maze.
Ment Retard. 1994 Aug;32(4):305-7; discussion 317-8.
9
Facilitated communication and authorship: a systematic review.
Augment Altern Commun. 2014 Dec;30(4):359-68. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.971490. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
10
Reliability and validity of the revised Triple C: Checklist of Communicative Competencies for adults with severe and multiple disabilities.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Jan;53(1):44-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01121.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Fuzzy Concept of Applied Behavior Analysis Research.
Behav Anal. 2017 May 15;40(1):123-159. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0093-x. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
Social Thinking®: Science, Pseudoscience, or Antiscience?
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Jan 26;9(2):152-7. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0108-1. eCollection 2016 Jun.
5
Science, skepticism, and applied behavior analysis.
Behav Anal Pract. 2008 Winter;1(2):42-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03391727.
6
Facilitated communication since 1995: a review of published studies.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Jun;31(3):287-313. doi: 10.1023/a:1010795219886.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief report: a case study assessing the validity of facilitated communication.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Mar;23(1):165-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01066425.
3
Brief report: facilitator-suggested conversational evaluation of facilitated communication.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Sep;23(3):541-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01046055.
4
Brief report: evaluation of eight case studies of facilitated communication.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1993 Sep;23(3):531-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01046054.
5
Brief report: a multitask controlled evaluation of facilitated communication.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Jun;24(3):369-79. doi: 10.1007/BF02172234.
6
Facilitated communication: an experimental evaluation.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Jun;24(3):345-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02172232.
7
A naturalistic approach to the validation of facilitated communication.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Oct;24(5):647-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02172144.
8
Issues raised by facilitated communication for theorizing and research on autism.
J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Dec;36(6):1108-19. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3606.1108.
9
Questions about facilitated communication and autism.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1992 Sep;22(3):331-7; discussion 337-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01048237.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验