• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Booster effect in elderly patients living in geriatric institutions].

作者信息

Tort J, Pina J M, Martín Ramos A, Espaulella J, Armengol J

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina Interna. Hospital de Terrassa, Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1995 Jun 10;105(2):41-4.

PMID:7603092
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tuberculinic response is weaker in elderly patients. To know the real tuberculinic reactivity in elderly patients living in geriatric institutions in Catalonia, Spain, and to reduce the probability of false negatives this study was carried out to detect the booster effect.

METHODS

Three hundred forty-three individuals with a mean age of 81 +/- 6.5 years, residing in four geriatric centers within the Central Health Care Region of Catalonia, were studied. After performing the first Mantoux intradermoreaction this was repeated at one week in case of negativity. A third test was carried out after one more week on persistence of negativity. Qualitative study was carried out on cell immunity in those patients whose first Mantoux test was negative.

RESULTS

The first Mantoux test was positive in 163 patients (47.5%) and the performance of the second and third test in cases of negativity of the previous test increased the number of positivities by 12.5% and 4.1%, respectively, up to a total of 220 patients (64%). In the patients who did not react to the first intradermoreaction and who preserved cell immunity a booster effect was obtained in 57 (52.8%). The prevalence of tuberculous infection in this group of elderly patients calculated in the group with preserved cell immunity was 81.2% while the morbidity of tuberculous disease in the positive cases in the Mantoux test was 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high frequency of the booster effect in elderly people, systematic testing is recommended to investigate tuberculinic reactivity in patients who are initially negative on Mantoux intradermoreaction.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Booster effect in elderly patients living in geriatric institutions].
Med Clin (Barc). 1995 Jun 10;105(2):41-4.
2
[Tuberculous infection in nursing students: prevalence and conversion during a 3-year follow-up].[护理专业学生的结核感染:3年随访期间的患病率及转归]
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Nov 27;113(18):685-9.
3
[Tuberculin reactivity in the elderly. Comparison of PPD-RT23 and PPD-CT68].[老年人的结核菌素反应性。PPD-RT23与PPD-CT68的比较]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1996 Feb;14(2):80-5.
4
Routine two-step skin testing for tuberculosis in the staff of a geriatric hospital in Israel: booster and conversion rates.以色列一家老年医院工作人员结核病常规两步皮肤测试:增强反应率和阳转率
J Hosp Infect. 2000 Oct;46(2):141-6. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2000.0787.
5
[Tuberculosis in compromised hosts].[免疫功能低下宿主中的结核病]
Kekkaku. 2003 Nov;78(11):717-22.
6
[Two step tuberculin testing among elderly Japanese admitted to residential homes].[入住养老院的日本老年人中的两步结核菌素试验]
Kekkaku. 2000 Nov;75(11):643-8.
7
The influence of BCG immunisation on tuberculin reactivity and booster effect in adults in a country with a high prevalence of tuberculosis.在一个结核病高流行国家中,卡介苗免疫对成年人结核菌素反应性及增强效应的影响。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Nov;10(11):980-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00970.x.
8
[Tuberculosis infection prevalence in children younger than 7 years of age in Cantabria. What is the recommended periodicity for the tuberculin tes?].[坎塔布里亚7岁以下儿童的结核感染患病率。结核菌素试验的推荐周期是多久?]
An Esp Pediatr. 1997 Mar;46(3):241-4.
9
Implications of simultaneous tests for tuberculin and non-tuberculous mycobacteria antigen in the elderly.老年人群中结核菌素与非结核分枝杆菌抗原联合检测的意义
Isr J Med Sci. 1997 Mar;33(3):170-4.
10
The booster phenomenon of tuberculin skin testing in patients receiving hemodialysis.接受血液透析患者结核菌素皮肤试验的增强现象。
Iran J Immunol. 2008 Dec;5(4):212-6.