Kellow J E, Cowan H, Shuter B, Riley J W, Lunzer M R, Eckstein R P, Höschl R, Lam S K
Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Apr;9(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00364.x.
To assess the efficacy of cisapride therapy in relieving symptoms of functional dyspepsia.
After a 2-week placebo run-in period, 61 out of 74 patients were eligible to enter a 4-week double-blind treatment phase, consisting of treatment with cisapride (10 mg) or placebo tablets t.d.s. Gastric emptying was assessed scintigraphically at entry to the study. Patients were stratified before treatment into those with or without active chronic (Helicobacter pylori) gastritis. Patients were also classified retrospectively into those with 'reflux-like' dyspepsia (n = 29) and those with 'motility-like' dyspepsia (n = 32).
At the end of the active treatment phase, there was a similar significant (P < 0.001) reduction in total symptom score from baseline in both cisapride (8.9 +/- 0.5 to 5.8 +/- 0.6) and placebo (9.7 +/- 0.6 to 5.5 +/- 0.6) groups. Scores for heartburn and continual bloating were significantly reduced in the cisapride but not the placebo group; improvement was attributable to patients with normal, rather than delayed, rates of gastric emptying. For continual bloating, significant improvement also occurred in the cisapride subgroup without gastritis, but not in the subgroup with gastritis (mean symptom score reduction 0.48 +/- 0.18, P = 0.03). For global evaluation by the investigator and by the patient, the overall improvement rates were not statistically different between cisapride and placebo groups. In those with normal gastric emptying, however, there was a significant (P = 0.01) improvement in general well-being in the cisapride but not in the placebo group.
We were unable to show major differences in the short-term efficacy of cisapride and placebo in functional dyspepsia. There were indications, however, of beneficial effects of cisapride over placebo in those with 'reflux-like' dyspepsia, and in those without gastroparesis.
评估西沙必利治疗功能性消化不良症状的疗效。
经过2周的安慰剂导入期后,74例患者中有61例符合进入为期4周的双盲治疗阶段的条件,该阶段包括西沙必利(10毫克)或安慰剂片剂每日3次治疗。在研究开始时通过闪烁扫描评估胃排空情况。治疗前将患者分为患有或未患有活动性慢性(幽门螺杆菌)胃炎的两组。患者还被回顾性分类为“反流样”消化不良(n = 29)和“动力样”消化不良(n = 32)两组。
在积极治疗阶段结束时,西沙必利组(8.9±0.5至5.8± 0.6)和安慰剂组(9.7±0.6至5.5±0.6)的总症状评分相对于基线均有相似的显著降低(P<0.001)。西沙必利组烧心和持续性腹胀的评分显著降低,而安慰剂组则未降低;改善归因于胃排空率正常而非延迟的患者。对于持续性腹胀,西沙必利无胃炎亚组也有显著改善,但有胃炎亚组未改善(平均症状评分降低0.48±0.18,P = 0.03)。对于研究者和患者的总体评估,西沙必利组和安慰剂组的总体改善率无统计学差异。然而,在胃排空正常的患者中,西沙必利组的总体健康状况有显著改善(P = 0.01),而安慰剂组则没有。
我们未能显示西沙必利和安慰剂在功能性消化不良短期疗效上的主要差异。然而,有迹象表明,西沙必利在“反流样”消化不良患者和无胃轻瘫患者中比安慰剂有有益作用。