Balding D J, Nichols R A
School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary & Westfield College, University of London, UK.
Genetica. 1995;96(1-2):3-12. doi: 10.1007/BF01441146.
A method is proposed for allowing for the effects of population differentiation, and other factors, in forensic inference based on DNA profiles. Much current forensic practice ignores, for example, the effects of coancestry and inappropriate databases and is consequently systematically biased against defendants. Problems with the 'product rule' for forensic identification have been highlighted by several authors, but important aspects of the problems are not widely appreciated. This arises in part because the match probability has often been confused with the relative frequency of the profile. Further, the analogous problems in paternity cases have received little attention. The proposed method is derived under general assumptions about the underlying population genetic processes. Probabilities relevant to forensic inference are expressed in terms of a single parameter whose values can be chosen to reflect the specific circumstances. The method is currently used in some UK courts and has important advantages over the 'Ceiling Principle' method, which has been criticized on a number of grounds.
本文提出了一种在基于DNA图谱的法医推断中考虑群体分化及其他因素影响的方法。例如,当前许多法医实践忽略了共同祖先和不适当数据库的影响,因此系统性地对被告不利。几位作者已经强调了法医鉴定中“乘积法则”存在的问题,但这些问题的重要方面并未得到广泛认识。部分原因在于匹配概率常常与图谱的相对频率相混淆。此外,亲子鉴定案件中的类似问题很少受到关注。所提出的方法是在关于潜在群体遗传过程的一般假设下推导出来的。与法医推断相关的概率通过一个单一参数来表示,其值可以根据具体情况进行选择。该方法目前在英国的一些法庭中使用,并且与因多种原因而受到批评的“上限原则”方法相比具有重要优势。