Miller K S, McAninch J W
Department of Urology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, USA.
J Urol. 1995 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):352-5. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199508000-00004.
We sought to evaluate the continuing validity of our criteria for radiographic imaging of renal injuries, that is penetrating flank or abdominal trauma, blunt trauma with gross hematuria or microscopic hematuria and shock, deceleration or major associated abdominal injury and pediatric renal trauma.
We reviewed the records of 2,254 patients who presented to our institution with suspected renal trauma between 1977 and 1992.
Of the 1,588 blunt trauma patients with microscopic hematuria and no shock 3 had significant injury but these cases were discovered during imaging or exploratory laparotomy for associated injuries. Followup in 515 of 1,004 patients (51%) who did not undergo initial imaging revealed no significant complications.
Adults with blunt renal trauma, microscopic hematuria and no shock or major associated intra-abdominal injuries can safely be spared radiographic imaging.
我们试图评估我们制定的肾损伤影像学检查标准的持续有效性,这些标准适用于穿透性侧腹或腹部创伤、伴有肉眼血尿或镜下血尿及休克的钝性创伤、减速伤或严重的相关腹部损伤以及小儿肾创伤。
我们回顾了1977年至1992年间因疑似肾创伤就诊于我院的2254例患者的记录。
在1588例镜下血尿且无休克的钝性创伤患者中,有3例存在严重损伤,但这些病例是在对相关损伤进行影像学检查或剖腹探查时发现的。1004例未进行初始影像学检查的患者中有515例(51%)进行了随访,未发现明显并发症。
对于钝性肾创伤、镜下血尿且无休克或严重相关腹腔内损伤的成年人,可以安全地不进行影像学检查。