Suppr超能文献

实用测量的临床医生指南。

A clinician's guide to utility measurement.

作者信息

Redelmeier D A, Detsky A S

机构信息

Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Prim Care. 1995 Jun;22(2):271-80.

PMID:7617786
Abstract

The approach described in this article is designed for clinicians who are striving to read utility analyses and understand patients' quality of life. We have introduced six questions to illuminate the complex issues underlying utility measurement and acknowledge the challenges encountered in conducting such research. Although not strict guidelines, the six questions provide a structured approach for recognizing high-quality articles and a swift method for discarding low-quality articles. We recognize that many studies seem poor when judged by these criteria, including some of our own. Yet we encourage clinicians, who are otherwise busy, to be selective in identifying utility analysis that merit attention. Without a structured approach, the temptation is to dismiss all articles as worthless and read nothing. The listed criteria, we hope, will help readers appreciate the merits of utility analyses and the role of patients' quality of life in decision analysis.

摘要

本文所述方法是为那些致力于研读效用分析并理解患者生活质量的临床医生设计的。我们提出了六个问题,以阐明效用测量背后的复杂问题,并认识到开展此类研究时遇到的挑战。这六个问题虽不是严格的指导方针,但提供了一种识别高质量文章的结构化方法,以及一种快速剔除低质量文章的方法。我们认识到,按照这些标准评判,许多研究似乎质量欠佳,包括我们自己的一些研究。然而,我们鼓励原本忙碌的临床医生在甄别值得关注的效用分析时有所选择。若没有结构化方法,人们往往会将所有文章都视为毫无价值而不予理会。我们希望,所列标准将帮助读者认识到效用分析的优点以及患者生活质量在决策分析中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验