Suppr超能文献

五种商用凝血活酶的比较:在自动凝血仪上进行国际敏感度指数重新评估

A comparison of five commercial thromboplastins: ISI re-evaluation on an automated coagulometer.

作者信息

Ford K, McArdle B, Kesteven P J

机构信息

Department of Haematology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Clin Lab Haematol. 1995 Mar;17(1):41-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1995.tb00315.x.

Abstract

Five commercial rabbit brain thromboplastins were compared with an International Reference Preparation on an ACL coagulometer, using 90 patients stabilized on warfarin and 22 normal individuals. The prothrombin times were converted to INRs using the thromboplastin manufacturers' quoted ISI. The quoted ISIs were reassigned using orthogonal regression analysis and then used to recalculate INRs for patient and commercial INR control plasmas. This showed that the manufacturers' quoted ISIs and the INR control plasma results were inconsistent. With one thromboplastin the manufacturers quoted ISI changed from 1.17 to 1.05 whilst the control plasma results changed from an INR of 4.3 to an INR of 3.7 (manufacturer's INR, 3.3). In most routine laboratories ISI reassignment is not practical. We conclude that the availability of a reliable plasma calibrant is essential for the accurate calculation of INRs at a local level.

摘要

在ACL凝血仪上,将5种市售兔脑凝血活酶与一种国际参考制剂进行比较,研究对象为90名服用华法林病情稳定的患者和22名正常人。使用凝血活酶制造商公布的国际敏感度指数(ISI)将凝血酶原时间换算为国际标准化比值(INR)。采用正交回归分析重新确定公布的ISI,然后用于重新计算患者和市售INR对照血浆的INR。结果表明,制造商公布的ISI与INR对照血浆结果不一致。对于一种凝血活酶,制造商公布的ISI从1.17变为1.05,而对照血浆结果从INR 4.3变为INR 3.7(制造商的INR为3.3)。在大多数常规实验室中,重新确定ISI并不实际。我们得出结论,可靠的血浆校准物对于在本地准确计算INR至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验