Lip G Y, Lowe G D, Rumley A, Dunn F G
Department of Cardiology, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow.
Br Heart J. 1995 Jun;73(6):527-33. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.6.527.
To determine whether chronic atrial fibrillation is associated with abnormalities in plasma fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor (vWF) (a marker of endothelial disturbance), or fibrin D- dimer (a measure of fibrin turnover); and if so, whether such levels are related to haemodynamic disturbance (enlarged left atrium, poor left ventricular function) or existing treatment with warfarin or aspirin. To investigate the effects of introducing warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation on fibrinogen and D- dimer levels.
Cross sectional population sample controlled study and longitudinal study of patients undergoing anticoagulation.
District general hospital.
87 patients (44 men and 43 women of mean (SEM) age 63.0 (1.0)) with chronic atrial fibrillation. At the time of the study, 37 were taking no antithrombotic medication (group 1), 31 were taking warfarin (including two on warfarin and aspirin) (group 2) and 19 were taking aspirin alone (group 3). They were compared with 158 population controls from a random population sample (the second Glasgow monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease study). As part of clinical treatment warfarin was introduced in 20 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (14 men and six women of mean (SEM) (range) age 63.9 (2.35 (32-74) years).
Plasma fibrinogen remained significantly increased in patients of group 1 (no antithrombotic medication) compared with that of the population controls (median difference 1.23 g/l; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.62, P < 0.0001). There was also a significant increase in plasma D-dimer levels (median difference 77 ng/ml; 95% CI 38 to 122, P < 0.01) and vWF (median difference 63 IU/dl; 95% CI 38 to 89, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in plasma fibrinogen (median difference 0.14 g/l; 95% CI -0.44 to 0.77, P = 0.65) or vWF (median difference 3.5 IU/dl; 95% CI - 41 to 41, P = not significant in patients of group 2 (warfarin treatment) compared with that of patients in group 1. Levels of D-dimer were significantly lower in group 2 (median difference 90 ng/ml, 95% CI 39 to 150, P < 0.0001) than in group 1. There were no significant differences in plasma fibrinogen (median difference 0.08 g/l; 95% CI - 0.52 to 0.77, P = 0.73), D-dimer (median difference - 34 ng/ml; 95% CI - 114 to 21.0, P = 0.25), or vWF (median difference 2%; 95% CI - 35 to 41, P = not significant) levels between patients of groups 1 and 3. There were no significant correlations between the coagulation indices and left atrial volume or ventricular function. There was a significant positive correlation between plasma fibrin D-dimer and vWF levels in patients of groups 1 and 3 (r = 0.52, P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in median plasma fibrin D-dimer levels at 2 months after the introduction of warfarin (181 ng/ml v 80 ng/ml, P < 0.001), but no effect on plasma fibrinogen.
Increased median plasma fibrinogen and vWF levels were found in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Plasma D-dimer levels were also increased in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation not receiving warfarin, suggesting increased intravascular thrombogenesis in such patients. Introduction of warfarin normalised circulating fibrin D- dimer levels, suggesting that warfarin treatment was effective in preventing excessive fibrin turnover, consistent with the antithrombotic effects of warfarin. These results suggest three possible thrombotic markers to assess patients with atrial fibrillation who are at high risk of thrombogenesis; D-dimer also merits assessment as a measure of reduction in thrombotic risk in patients receiving warfarin.
确定慢性房颤是否与血浆纤维蛋白原、血管性血友病因子(vWF)(内皮功能紊乱的标志物)或纤维蛋白D - 二聚体(纤维蛋白周转的指标)异常有关;如果有关,这些水平是否与血流动力学紊乱(左心房扩大、左心室功能不良)或华法林或阿司匹林的现有治疗相关。研究对房颤患者应用华法林后对纤维蛋白原和D - 二聚体水平的影响。
横断面人群样本对照研究及对抗凝治疗患者的纵向研究。
地区综合医院。
87例慢性房颤患者(44例男性和43例女性,平均(标准误)年龄63.0(1.0)岁)。研究时,37例未服用抗血栓药物(第1组),31例服用华法林(包括2例同时服用华法林和阿司匹林)(第2组),19例仅服用阿司匹林(第3组)。将他们与来自随机人群样本的158名人群对照(第二项格拉斯哥心血管疾病监测趋势及决定因素研究)进行比较。作为临床治疗的一部分,对20例慢性房颤患者(14例男性和6例女性,平均(标准误)(范围)年龄63.9(2.35(32 - 74)岁)应用华法林。
与人群对照相比,第1组(未服用抗血栓药物)患者的血浆纤维蛋白原仍显著升高(中位数差异1.23 g/L;95%置信区间(CI)0.88至1.62,P < 0.0001)。血浆D - 二聚体水平(中位数差异77 ng/ml;95% CI 38至122,P < 0.01)和vWF(中位数差异63 IU/dl;95% CI 38至89,P < 0.0001)也显著升高。与第1组患者相比,第2组(华法林治疗)患者的血浆纤维蛋白原(中位数差异0.14 g/L;95% CI - 0.44至0.77,P = 0.65)或vWF(中位数差异3.5 IU/dl;95% CI - 41至41,P = 无显著性差异)无显著差异。第2组的D - 二聚体水平显著低于第1组(中位数差异90 ng/ml,95% CI 39至150,P < 0.0001)。第1组和第3组患者之间的血浆纤维蛋白原(中位数差异0.08 g/L;95% CI - 0.52至0.77,P = 0.73)、D - 二聚体(中位数差异 - 34 ng/ml;95% CI - 114至21.0,P = 0.25)或vWF(中位数差异2%;95% CI - 35至41,P = 无显著性差异)水平无显著差异。凝血指标与左心房容积或心室功能之间无显著相关性。第1组和第3组患者的血浆纤维蛋白D - 二聚体与vWF水平之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.52,P < 0.001)。应用华法林2个月后,血浆纤维蛋白D - 二聚体中位数水平显著降低(181 ng/ml对80 ng/ml,P < 0.001),但对血浆纤维蛋白原无影响。
慢性房颤患者血浆纤维蛋白原和vWF中位数水平升高。未接受华法林治疗的慢性房颤患者血浆D - 二聚体水平也升高,提示此类患者血管内血栓形成增加。应用华法林可使循环纤维蛋白D - 二聚体水平恢复正常,提示华法林治疗可有效预防纤维蛋白过度周转,这与华法林的抗血栓作用一致。这些结果提示三种可能的血栓形成标志物,用于评估有高血栓形成风险房颤患者;D - 二聚体也值得作为接受华法林治疗患者血栓形成风险降低的指标进行评估。