Robinson L A, Stacy R, Spencer J A, Bhopal R S
Department of Primary Health Care, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):315-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.315.
An important type of review undertaken routinely in health care teams is analysis of individual cases. This informal process can be turned into a structured and effective form of audit by using an adaptation of the "critical incident" technique in facilitated case discussions. Participants are asked to recall personal situations that they feel represent either effective or ineffective practice. From such review of individual cases arise general standards to improve the quality of care. On the basis of a study of audit of deaths in general practice, we describe how to implement such a system, including forming and maintaining the discussion group, methodology, and guidelines for facilitators. Problems that may arise during the case discussions are outlined and their management discussed, including problems within the team and with the process of the discussions.
医疗团队日常进行的一项重要审查类型是对个别病例进行分析。通过在便利的病例讨论中采用“关键事件”技术的改编形式,这个非正式过程可以转变为一种结构化且有效的审计形式。参与者被要求回忆他们认为代表有效或无效实践的个人情况。通过对个别病例的这种审查得出提高护理质量的一般标准。基于对全科医疗中死亡审计的一项研究,我们描述了如何实施这样一个系统,包括组建和维持讨论小组、方法以及给协调人的指导方针。概述了病例讨论期间可能出现的问题并讨论了其管理方法,包括团队内部的问题以及讨论过程中的问题。