Suppr超能文献

社区参与医疗保健决策:可行吗?

Community participation in health care decision making: is it feasible?

作者信息

Singer M A

出版信息

CMAJ. 1995 Aug 15;153(4):421-4.

Abstract

Health care reform strategies proposed by provincial governments include decentralized funding and increased public participation in decision making. These proposals do not give details as to the public participation process, and a number of questions have been raised by the experience of some communities. Which citizens should form the decision-making group? What information do they need? What kinds of decisions should they make? What level of participation should they have? The results of a survey by Abelson and associates (see pages 403 to 412 of this issue) challenge the assumption that "communities" are willing to participate in health-care and social-service decision making. Willingness varied according to the composition of the groups polled, and participants' support for traditional decision makers increased after the complexities of the decision-making process were discussed. However, whereas their study measured willingness to participate at one point in time only, experience gained from Ontario's Better Beginnings, Better Futures project indicates that, given sufficient time, "ordinary" citizens are willing and can acquire the skills needed to decide how resources should be allocated for social services.

摘要

省政府提出的医疗保健改革策略包括资金下放以及增加公众在决策过程中的参与度。这些提议并未详细说明公众参与的过程,一些社区的经验也引发了诸多问题。哪些公民应组成决策小组?他们需要哪些信息?他们应做出何种决策?他们应具备何种参与程度?艾伯森及其同事的一项调查结果(见本期第403至412页)对“社区”愿意参与医疗保健和社会服务决策这一假设提出了质疑。意愿程度因被调查群体的构成而异,在讨论了决策过程的复杂性之后,参与者对传统决策者的支持有所增加。然而,尽管他们的研究仅在某一时刻衡量了参与意愿,但安大略省“美好开端,美好未来”项目所获得的经验表明,给予足够的时间,“普通”公民愿意且能够掌握决定如何分配社会服务资源所需的技能。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.优先事项设定:来自俄勒冈州的经验教训。
Lancet. 1991 Apr 13;337(8746):891-4. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90213-9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验