Singer M A
CMAJ. 1995 Aug 15;153(4):421-4.
Health care reform strategies proposed by provincial governments include decentralized funding and increased public participation in decision making. These proposals do not give details as to the public participation process, and a number of questions have been raised by the experience of some communities. Which citizens should form the decision-making group? What information do they need? What kinds of decisions should they make? What level of participation should they have? The results of a survey by Abelson and associates (see pages 403 to 412 of this issue) challenge the assumption that "communities" are willing to participate in health-care and social-service decision making. Willingness varied according to the composition of the groups polled, and participants' support for traditional decision makers increased after the complexities of the decision-making process were discussed. However, whereas their study measured willingness to participate at one point in time only, experience gained from Ontario's Better Beginnings, Better Futures project indicates that, given sufficient time, "ordinary" citizens are willing and can acquire the skills needed to decide how resources should be allocated for social services.
省政府提出的医疗保健改革策略包括资金下放以及增加公众在决策过程中的参与度。这些提议并未详细说明公众参与的过程,一些社区的经验也引发了诸多问题。哪些公民应组成决策小组?他们需要哪些信息?他们应做出何种决策?他们应具备何种参与程度?艾伯森及其同事的一项调查结果(见本期第403至412页)对“社区”愿意参与医疗保健和社会服务决策这一假设提出了质疑。意愿程度因被调查群体的构成而异,在讨论了决策过程的复杂性之后,参与者对传统决策者的支持有所增加。然而,尽管他们的研究仅在某一时刻衡量了参与意愿,但安大略省“美好开端,美好未来”项目所获得的经验表明,给予足够的时间,“普通”公民愿意且能够掌握决定如何分配社会服务资源所需的技能。