Suppr超能文献

[利用SOS色变试验预测化合物致癌活性的前景]

[Prospects for using the SOS-Chromotest for predicting carcinogenic activity of chemical compounds].

作者信息

Koreshkova S V, Tanirbergenov T B, Tarasov V A

出版信息

Genetika. 1995 Jun;31(6):861-4.

PMID:7635324
Abstract

When studying the carcinogenic activity of a compound, one of the basic problems is to determine the predictability of the methods used for testing; in our opinion, the most promising method is the SOS chromotest. To evaluate the test, we sampled 25 substances with a known carcinogenic activity, which had not been tested with the SOS chromotest before. Properties of the SOS chromotest were analyzed on the basis of a database containing 154 substances at present, which are characterized with regard to the presence or absence of a carcinogenic effect in rodents. The results are distributed as follows: 121 carcinogens, of which 79 positively respond to the SOS chromotest; 33 noncarcinogenes, of which 28 negatively respond to the SOS chromotest. The sensitivity and specificity of the SOS chromotest were measured as 65.3 and 84.9%, respectively. Comparing the results obtained with the Ames test and with the SOS chromotest, it was shown that the tests were similar in sensitivity and specificity. A similar predictability of both methods was also recorded.

摘要

在研究一种化合物的致癌活性时,一个基本问题是确定所使用测试方法的可预测性;在我们看来,最有前景的方法是SOS色变试验。为了评估该测试,我们选取了25种具有已知致癌活性且之前未用SOS色变试验进行测试的物质。基于目前包含154种物质的数据库分析了SOS色变试验的特性,这些物质根据在啮齿动物中是否存在致癌作用进行了表征。结果分布如下:121种致癌物,其中79种对SOS色变试验呈阳性反应;33种非致癌物,其中28种对SOS色变试验呈阴性反应。SOS色变试验的敏感性和特异性分别测定为65.3%和84.9%。将所得结果与艾姆斯试验和SOS色变试验的结果进行比较,结果表明这两种试验在敏感性和特异性方面相似。还记录到两种方法具有相似的可预测性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验