• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility.

作者信息

Gregoriou O, Pyrgiotis E, Konidaris S, Papadias C, Zourlas P A

机构信息

Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, Areteion Hospital, Greece.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;39(4):226-8. doi: 10.1159/000292415.

DOI:10.1159/000292415
PMID:7635364
Abstract

In this prospective randomized study we treated 60 couples with unexplained infertility with a combination of ovarian stimulation and either intrauterine insemination (IUI) or fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP). In the IUI we used a volume of 0.5 ml of inseminate and in the FSP a volume of 4 ml. The demographic characteristics of the patients, the stimulation parameters and the sperm data were not statistically different between the two groups. The pregnancy rate per cycle was 16.2% in the IUI group and 14.5% in the FSP group and the pregnancy rate per woman was 40 and 36.7%, respectively (not statistically different). We conclude that IUI and FSP are equally effective in the treatment of couples with unexplained infertility.

摘要

相似文献

1
Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;39(4):226-8. doi: 10.1159/000292415.
2
Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study.
Hum Reprod. 1993 Jun;8(6):890-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138161.
3
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub2.
4
A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility.
Fertil Steril. 2001 Dec;76(6):1242-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02913-2.
5
Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial.不明原因不孕症中输卵管精子灌注与宫内人工授精的比较:一项随机、前瞻性、交叉试验。
Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.015.
6
Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility.
Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):939-42. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81411-2.
7
Intra-uterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub3.
8
Higher pregnancy rates with a simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion, using the cervical clamp double nut bivalve speculum in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study.使用宫颈夹双螺母双瓣窥器进行输卵管精子灌注的简单方法治疗不明原因不孕症的妊娠率更高:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Hum Reprod. 1996 Dec;11(12):2618-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019181.
9
The value of fallopian tube sperm perfusion in the management of mild-moderate male factor infertility.输卵管精子灌注在处理轻度-中度男性因素不育中的价值。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 May;117(2):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.11.023. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
10
Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination: a prospective randomized study.输卵管精子灌注与宫腔内输卵管内人工授精的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):735-40. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical success of IUI cycles with donor sperm is not affected by total inseminated volume: a RCT.供精宫腔内人工授精周期的临床成功率不受总授精体积的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Feb 15;2018(2):hoy002. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy002. eCollection 2018.
2
The comparison between Intrauterine Insemination and Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion Using FAST®System in Patients with Unexplained Infertility.使用FAST®系统对不明原因不孕症患者进行宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan-Mar;8(4):379-84. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4177. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
3
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.
非输卵管性不孕症中宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较
Med J Armed Forces India. 2012 Jul;68(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 May 12.
4
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;2013(10):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub4.