Longo R, Bampo A, Vidimari R, Magnaldi S, Giorgini A
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trieste, Italy.
Invest Radiol. 1995 Apr;30(4):199-203. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199504000-00001.
Three different calibration techniques of 1H localized nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were applied to a group of healthy volunteers. Absolute concentrations of the metabolites and their standard deviations were compared, and the clinical feasibility of these calibration technique is discussed.
Eighteen healthy volunteers were included in the study. Both water and creatine were used as internal standard, and a pertinent solution of metabolites was used as an external standard. The T2 relaxation times of the brain metabolites were evaluated in each examination.
The concentrations obtained using water as an internal standard and using an external standard are very similar, and the first of these methods show smaller standard deviations. The authors' results show that the use of creatine as an internal standard may induce systematic errors in absolute calibration because of the uncertainty on the true creatine concentration.
将三种不同的1H局部核磁共振(NMR)谱校准技术应用于一组健康志愿者。比较了代谢物的绝对浓度及其标准差,并讨论了这些校准技术的临床可行性。
18名健康志愿者纳入本研究。水和肌酸均用作内标,相关代谢物溶液用作外标。每次检查时评估脑代谢物的T2弛豫时间。
以水为内标和以外标获得的浓度非常相似,且前一种方法的标准差较小。作者的结果表明,由于真实肌酸浓度存在不确定性,使用肌酸作为内标可能会在绝对校准中引入系统误差。