Green S, Dawson B T
School of Human Movement Studies, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(4):351-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00865033.
The regression of oxygen uptake (VO2) on power output and the O2 demand predicted for suprapeak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) exercise (power output = 432 W) were compared in ten male cyclists [C, mean VO2peak = 67.9 (SD 4.2) ml.kg-1.min-1] and nine active, yet untrained men [UT, mean VO2peak = 54.1 (SD 6.5) ml.kg-1.min-1]. The VO2-power regression was determined using a continuous incremental cycle test (CON4), performed twice, which comprised several 4-min exercise periods progressing in intensity from approximately 40%-85% VO2peak. Minute ventilation (VE), heart rate (HR), respiratory exchange ratio (R), blood lactate concentration ([la-]b) and rectal temperature (Tre) were measured at rest and during CON4. The slope of the VO2-power regression was greater (P < or = 0.05) in C [12.4 (SD 0.7) ml.min-1.W-1] compared to UT [11.7 (SD 0.4) ml.min-1.W-1]; as a result, the O2 demand (at 432 W) was also higher (P < or = 0.05) in C [5.97 (SD 0.23) l.min-1] than UT [5.70 (SD 0.15) l.min-1]. Exercise R and [la-]b were lower (P < or = 0.05) in C in comparison to UT at all power outputs, whereas VE and HR were relatively lower (P < or = 0.05) in C at power outputs approximating 180 W, 220 W and 270 W. Differences in fat metabolism estimated over the first three power outputs accounted for approximately 19% of the difference in VO2-power slopes between the groups and up to 46% of the difference in VO2 at a given intensity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在10名男性自行车运动员[C组,平均最大摄氧量(VO2peak)=67.9(标准差4.2)ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹]和9名活跃但未受过训练的男性[UT组,平均VO2peak =54.1(标准差6.5)ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹]中,比较了摄氧量(VO2)对功率输出的回归以及预测的超最大摄氧量(VO2peak)运动(功率输出=432W)的氧气需求。使用连续递增自行车测试(CON4)确定VO2-功率回归,该测试进行了两次,包括几个4分钟的运动时段,强度从大约40% - 85%VO2peak逐渐增加。在休息时和CON4期间测量分钟通气量(VE)、心率(HR)、呼吸交换率(R)、血乳酸浓度([la⁻]b)和直肠温度(Tre)。与UT组[11.7(标准差0.4)ml·min⁻¹·W⁻¹]相比,C组[12.4(标准差0.7)ml·min⁻¹·W⁻¹]的VO2-功率回归斜率更大(P≤0.05);因此,C组(432W时)的氧气需求[5.97(标准差0.23)l·min⁻¹]也高于UT组[5.70(标准差0.15)l·min⁻¹](P≤0.05)。在所有功率输出下,C组的运动R和[la⁻]b均低于UT组(P≤0.05),而在功率输出接近180W、220W和270W时,C组的VE和HR相对较低(P≤0.05)。在前三个功率输出中估计的脂肪代谢差异约占两组VO2-功率斜率差异的19%,在给定强度下占VO2差异的4