• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1969 - 1989年对基辅切尔诺贝利事故对妊娠结局影响的选择性监测。

Selective monitoring for a Chernobyl effect on pregnancy outcome in Kiev, 1969-1989.

作者信息

Buzhievskaya T I, Tchaikovskaya T L, Demidova G G, Koblyanskaya G N

机构信息

Department of Medical Genetics, Kiev Institute for Advanced Medical Studies, Ministry of Health of Ukraine.

出版信息

Hum Biol. 1995 Aug;67(4):657-72.

PMID:7649537
Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to determine the frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Kiev during the period surrounding the Chernobyl accident on April 26, 1986. Additional effective equivalent doses resulting from the catastrophic irradiation in 1986-1991 was 8.04 mSv for Kiev inhabitants. We retrospectively analyzed the archives of the two largest obstetric hospitals between 1969 and 1990. Spontaneous miscarriages, congenital anomalies, and perinatal mortality varied during the two decades without any pronounced changes in any direction. Additional long-term follow-up is needed to determine mutagenic or carcinogenic effects.

摘要

本调查的目的是确定1986年4月26日切尔诺贝利事故前后基辅不良妊娠结局的发生频率。1986 - 1991年基辅居民因灾难性辐射产生的额外有效当量剂量为8.04毫希沃特。我们回顾性分析了1969年至1990年两家最大产科医院的档案。在这二十年中,自然流产、先天性异常和围产期死亡率有所变化,但未出现任何明显的方向性变化。需要进行额外的长期随访以确定诱变或致癌作用。

相似文献

1
Selective monitoring for a Chernobyl effect on pregnancy outcome in Kiev, 1969-1989.1969 - 1989年对基辅切尔诺贝利事故对妊娠结局影响的选择性监测。
Hum Biol. 1995 Aug;67(4):657-72.
2
[Limited genetic monitoring in Kiev in relation to the accident at the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power Station].[基辅针对切尔诺贝利原子能发电站事故开展的有限基因监测]
Tsitol Genet. 1993 Jul-Aug;27(4):19-29.
3
Changes in registered congenital anomalies in the Republic of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident.切尔诺贝利事故后白俄罗斯共和国登记的先天性异常变化。
Stem Cells. 1997;15 Suppl 2:255-60. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530150734.
4
Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system at autopsy in Croatia in the period before and after the Chernobyl accident.切尔诺贝利事故前后克罗地亚尸检时发现的中枢神经系统先天性异常。
Acta Med Croatica. 1998;52(2):103-7.
5
[Genetic or ecogenetic consequences of the Chernobyl accident? (facts and hypotheses)].
Tsitol Genet. 1996 Jul-Aug;30(4):86-96.
6
Childhood leukaemia in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine following the Chernobyl power station accident: results from an international collaborative population-based case-control study.切尔诺贝利核电站事故后白俄罗斯、俄罗斯和乌克兰儿童白血病情况:一项基于人群的国际协作病例对照研究结果
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;35(2):386-96. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi220. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
7
Morbidity in a large cohort study of children born to mothers exposed to radiation from Chernobyl.一项针对切尔诺贝利辐射暴露母亲所生儿童的大型队列研究中的发病率。
Stem Cells. 1997;15 Suppl 2:141-50. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530150721.
8
[Main results and goals of epidemiological studies of medical consequences of the Chernobyl AES accident (results of a 4-year follow-up)].[切尔诺贝利核电站事故医学后果的流行病学研究的主要结果和目标(4年随访结果)]
Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR. 1991(11):36-8.
9
[Cytogenetic effects in children exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation].[低剂量电离辐射暴露儿童的细胞遗传学效应]
Tsitol Genet. 2002 Nov-Dec;36(6):38-45.
10
[Did the Chernobyl accident cause anomalies in fetuses?].[切尔诺贝利事故是否导致胎儿出现异常?]
Duodecim. 1991;107(9):695-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Consequences of Natural and Man-made Disasters on Pregnancy Outcomes and Complications: A Systematic Review.自然和人为灾害对妊娠结局及并发症的影响:一项系统综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 9;12(1):e61. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2268. eCollection 2024.
2
Chernobyl fallout and outcome of pregnancy in Finland.芬兰的切尔诺贝利核辐射沉降物与妊娠结局
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Feb;109(2):179-85. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109179.
3
Regression analysis of time trends in perinatal mortality in Germany 1980-1993.1980 - 1993年德国围产期死亡率时间趋势的回归分析。
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Feb;108(2):159-65. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108159.