Roe M, Kishiyama C, Davidson K, Schaefer L, Todd J
Department of Microbiology, Children's Hospital, Denver, Colorado 80218, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1551-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1551-1553.1995.
We directly compared three techniques for the diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in 500 symptomatic children seen in the Emergency Department or Child Care Clinic of The Children's Hospital of Denver. Throats were vigorously swabbed with two rayon swabs, which were transported immediately to the Microbiology Laboratory. Each swab was cultured aerobically on Strep A Isolation Agar (Remel) and then tested for antigen-one swab by the Strep A OIA optical immune assay (BioStar) and the other by the TestPack Plus Strep A (Abbott) technique. Each test was performed blind to the others. The refrigerated pledget was cultured in Todd-Hewitt broth if an antigen test was positive and both direct plate cultures were negative (the "gold standard" was any culture positive). All isolates were serologically grouped. Of 500 complete patient cultures, 151 (30%) were positive for group A streptococcal growth. The two antigen tests gave comparable results with an average sensitivity of 83%. Each was significantly (P < 0.02) less sensitive than its corresponding culture. The BioStar Strep A OIA optical immune assay produced significantly (P < 0.003) more false-positive results than did the Abbott test. Rapid antigen testing is not sensitive enough to eliminate the need for backup cultures.
我们对丹佛儿童医院急诊科或儿童保健诊所中500名有症状儿童的A组链球菌性咽炎诊断的三种技术进行了直接比较。用两根人造纤维拭子大力擦拭咽喉,然后立即送往微生物实验室。每根拭子在A组链球菌分离琼脂(Remel)上进行需氧培养,然后一根拭子通过A组链球菌OIA光学免疫测定法(BioStar)检测抗原,另一根通过TestPack Plus A组链球菌(雅培)技术检测抗原。每项检测均对其他检测结果保密。如果抗原检测呈阳性且两个直接平板培养均为阴性,则将冷藏的棉拭子在托德-休伊特肉汤中培养(“金标准”是任何培养阳性)。所有分离株均进行血清学分型。在500份完整的患者培养物中,151份(30%)A组链球菌生长呈阳性。两种抗原检测结果相当,平均灵敏度为83%。每种检测的灵敏度均显著低于相应培养(P<0.02)。与雅培检测相比,BioStar A组链球菌OIA光学免疫测定法产生的假阳性结果显著更多(P<0.003)。快速抗原检测灵敏度不足以消除备用培养的必要性。