Marshall S A, Sutton L D, Jones R N
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 Aug;22(4):353-5. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00136-2.
The efficacy of three rapid colorimetric disk assays to detect beta-lactamase production in 60 clinical isolates was evaluated. Two chromogenic cephalosporin substrates (S1 and nitrocefin) and an acidimetric test were in complete agreement when tested against Enterococcus spp. (20 strains, not Enterococcus faecalis), Prevotella spp. (10 strains) and Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (10 strains). However, the acidimetric test produced documented false-negative results in detecting the beta-lactamases from coagulase-negative staphylococci (two of 20 strains tested). The time required to produce a positive result for the discordant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate favored S1 compared with nitrocefin. These studies indicate that the acidimetric test was less sensitive than the chromogenic cephalosporin substrates and that nitrocefin and S1 could be used to screen for beta-lactamase production in these tested species.
评估了三种快速比色盘法检测60株临床分离株中β-内酰胺酶产生情况的效果。当针对肠球菌属(20株,非粪肠球菌)、普雷沃菌属(10株)和革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌(10株)进行检测时,两种显色头孢菌素底物(S1和硝基头孢菌素)和一种酸度测定法结果完全一致。然而,在检测凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(检测的20株中有2株)的β-内酰胺酶时,酸度测定法出现了有记录的假阴性结果。与硝基头孢菌素相比,产生不一致结果的表皮葡萄球菌分离株产生阳性结果所需的时间更有利于S1。这些研究表明,酸度测定法的敏感性低于显色头孢菌素底物,硝基头孢菌素和S1可用于筛选这些受试菌种中β-内酰胺酶的产生情况。