Appelbaum P C, Spangler S K, Jacobs M R
Department of Pathology (Clinical Microbiology), Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jan;9(1):47-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01969535.
A total of 978 strains of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium were tested for beta-lactamase production by a disk test (Cefinase) and a microtiter nitrocefin assay. In 83% of strains both tests were positive and in 14.8% both were negative. In 1.7% of strains the disk test was positive and the microtiter test negative, and in 0.4% the disk test negative but the microtiter test positive. The disk test was less discriminatory in detecting amoxicillin-resistant strains. The microtiter test was less sensitive than the disk test, but more discriminatory if results were read within 1 h for Fusobacterium spp., within 8 h for the Bacteroides fragilis group, and within 2 h for other Bacteroides spp. Neither test should be used clinically at present.
通过纸片法(头孢硝噻吩纸片)和微量滴定法硝基头孢菌素分析,对总共978株拟杆菌属和梭杆菌属菌株进行了β-内酰胺酶产生情况检测。83%的菌株两种检测均呈阳性,14.8%的菌株两种检测均呈阴性。1.7%的菌株纸片法检测呈阳性而微量滴定法检测呈阴性,0.4%的菌株纸片法检测呈阴性但微量滴定法检测呈阳性。纸片法在检测对阿莫西林耐药菌株方面的鉴别力较低。微量滴定法比纸片法灵敏度低,但如果在1小时内读取梭杆菌属菌株结果、8小时内读取脆弱拟杆菌群结果以及2小时内读取其他拟杆菌属菌株结果,其鉴别力更强。目前这两种检测方法均不应在临床中使用。