Suppr超能文献

两种用于快速检测拟杆菌属和梭杆菌属中β-内酰胺酶产生的方法的评估。

Evaluation of two methods for rapid testing for beta-lactamase production in Bacteroides and Fusobacterium.

作者信息

Appelbaum P C, Spangler S K, Jacobs M R

机构信息

Department of Pathology (Clinical Microbiology), Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jan;9(1):47-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01969535.

Abstract

A total of 978 strains of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium were tested for beta-lactamase production by a disk test (Cefinase) and a microtiter nitrocefin assay. In 83% of strains both tests were positive and in 14.8% both were negative. In 1.7% of strains the disk test was positive and the microtiter test negative, and in 0.4% the disk test negative but the microtiter test positive. The disk test was less discriminatory in detecting amoxicillin-resistant strains. The microtiter test was less sensitive than the disk test, but more discriminatory if results were read within 1 h for Fusobacterium spp., within 8 h for the Bacteroides fragilis group, and within 2 h for other Bacteroides spp. Neither test should be used clinically at present.

摘要

通过纸片法(头孢硝噻吩纸片)和微量滴定法硝基头孢菌素分析,对总共978株拟杆菌属和梭杆菌属菌株进行了β-内酰胺酶产生情况检测。83%的菌株两种检测均呈阳性,14.8%的菌株两种检测均呈阴性。1.7%的菌株纸片法检测呈阳性而微量滴定法检测呈阴性,0.4%的菌株纸片法检测呈阴性但微量滴定法检测呈阳性。纸片法在检测对阿莫西林耐药菌株方面的鉴别力较低。微量滴定法比纸片法灵敏度低,但如果在1小时内读取梭杆菌属菌株结果、8小时内读取脆弱拟杆菌群结果以及2小时内读取其他拟杆菌属菌株结果,其鉴别力更强。目前这两种检测方法均不应在临床中使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验