Suppr超能文献

使用气道管理系统(双水平气道正压通气)设备进行压力支持通气时二氧化碳重复吸入的评估。

Evaluation of carbon dioxide rebreathing during pressure support ventilation with airway management system (BiPAP) devices.

作者信息

Lofaso F, Brochard L, Touchard D, Hang T, Harf A, Isabey D

机构信息

Service de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionelles, Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.

出版信息

Chest. 1995 Sep;108(3):772-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.3.772.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether carbon dioxide (CO2) rebreathing occurs in acute respiratory failure patients ventilated using the standard airway management system (BiPAP pressure support ventilator; Respironics; Murrysville, Pa) with positive inspiratory airway pressure and a minimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and whether any CO2 rebreathing may be efficiently prevented by the addition of a nonrebreathing valve to the BiPAP system circuit. In the first part of the study, the standard device was tested on a lung model with a nonrebreathing valve (BiPAP-NRV) and with the usual Whisper Swivel connector (BiPAP-uc). With the BiPAP-uc device, the resident volume of expired air in the inspiratory circuit at the end of expiration (RVEA) was 55% of the tidal volume (VT) when the inspiratory pressure was 10 cm H2O and the frequency was at 15 cycles per minute. The BiPAP-NRV device efficiently prevented CO2 rebreathing but resulted in a slight decrease in VT, which was due to a significant increase in external PEEP (2.4 vs 1.3 cm H2O) caused by the additional expiratory valve resistance. For similar reasons, both the pressure swing necessary to trigger pressure support and the imposed expiratory work were increased in the lung model when the nonrebreathing valve was used. In the second part of the study, seven patients weaned from mechanical ventilation were investigated using a randomized crossover design to compare three situations: pressure support ventilation with a conventional intensive care ventilator (CIPS), BiPAP system use, and BiPAP-NRV. When we compared the BiPAP system use with the other two systems, we observed no significant effect on blood gases but found significant increases in VT, minute ventilation, and work of breathing. These findings are experimental and are clinical evidence that significant CO2 rebreathing occurs with the standard BiPAP system. This drawback can be overcome by using a non-rebreathing valve, but only at the expense of greater expiratory resistance.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在使用标准气道管理系统(双水平气道正压通气压力支持呼吸机;瑞思迈公司;宾夕法尼亚州默里斯维尔)进行通气的急性呼吸衰竭患者中,是否会发生二氧化碳(CO₂)重复吸入,该系统具有吸气气道正压和最低水平的呼气末正压(PEEP),以及在双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)系统回路中添加一个无重复吸入阀是否可以有效防止任何CO₂重复吸入。在研究的第一部分,在带有无重复吸入阀的肺模型(BiPAP-NRV)和通常的Whisper Swivel接头(BiPAP-uc)上测试标准设备。使用BiPAP-uc设备时,当吸气压力为10 cm H₂O且频率为每分钟15次时,呼气末吸气回路中的呼出空气残留量(RVEA)为潮气量(VT)的55%。BiPAP-NRV设备有效防止了CO₂重复吸入,但导致VT略有下降,这是由于额外的呼气阀阻力导致外部PEEP显著增加(2.4 vs 1.3 cm H₂O)。出于类似原因,当使用无重复吸入阀时,在肺模型中触发压力支持所需的压力摆动和施加的呼气功均增加。在研究的第二部分,对七名从机械通气中撤机的患者采用随机交叉设计进行研究,以比较三种情况:使用传统重症监护呼吸机(CIPS)进行压力支持通气、使用BiPAP系统以及使用BiPAP-NRV。当我们将使用BiPAP系统与其他两个系统进行比较时,我们观察到对血气没有显著影响,但发现VT、分钟通气量和呼吸功显著增加。这些发现是实验性的,并且是临床证据表明标准BiPAP系统会发生显著的CO₂重复吸入。这个缺点可以通过使用无重复吸入阀来克服,但代价是呼气阻力更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验