van Engelen J G, Kezić S, de Haan W, Opdam J J, de Wolff F A
University of Amsterdam, Coronel Laboratory for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Human Toxicology, Netherlands.
J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1995 May 19;667(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/0378-4347(95)00029-i.
Three methods for the determination of 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD) in urine were compared in order to assess their applicability for toxicokinetic studies and biological monitoring of occupational exposure to n-hexane. Two of them were based on derivatization, followed by gas chromatography and electron-capture detection. Of these two, one is a modification of the other, already published, method. The third one involves direct extraction of 2,5-HD followed by gas chromatography and flame-ionization detection. To determine 2,5-HD in urine of workers occupationally exposed to n-hexane, the most straightforward method, direct extraction of 2,5-HD from urine, has been proven to be the most suitable. However, in case of very low concentrations of 2,5-HD in urine, or analysis of small samples of blood, e.g. in kinetic studies, it is necessary to use a more sensitive procedure. The sensitivity of the methods based on the derivatization of 2,5-HD followed by electron-capture detection, was, as expected, much higher in terms of analytical reliability. By using these methods, however, precautions are necessary to avoid a matrix effect.
比较了三种测定尿中2,5 -己二酮(2,5 - HD)的方法,以评估它们在正己烷职业暴露的毒物动力学研究和生物监测中的适用性。其中两种方法基于衍生化,随后进行气相色谱和电子捕获检测。在这两种方法中,一种是对已发表的另一种方法的改进。第三种方法是直接萃取2,5 - HD,随后进行气相色谱和火焰离子化检测。为了测定职业性接触正己烷工人尿中的2,5 - HD,已证明最直接的方法,即从尿中直接萃取2,5 - HD,是最合适的。然而,在尿中2,5 - HD浓度非常低的情况下,或分析少量血液样本时,例如在动力学研究中,有必要使用更灵敏的方法。基于2,5 - HD衍生化后进行电子捕获检测的方法,在分析可靠性方面,灵敏度正如预期的要高得多。然而,使用这些方法时,必须采取预防措施以避免基质效应。