Kawai T, Mizunuma K, Yasugi T, Uchida Y, Ikeda M
Department of Public Health, Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990;62(5):403-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00381372.
To identify the method of choice for analysis of urine for 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD) as an indicator of occupational exposure to n-hexane, the end-of-shift urine samples of 36 n-hexane exposed male workers and 30 non-exposed male workers were analyzed for 2,5-HD under three conditions of hydrolysis, i.e. enzymic hydrolysis at pH 4.8, acid hydrolysis at pH 0.5, and without hydrolysis. The 2,5-HD concentrations thus determined were examined for correlation with 8-h, time-weighted average exposure concentrations of n-hexane measured by diffusive sampling. The regression analysis showed that the 2,5-HD concentrations without any hydrolysis correlated best with the intensity of exposure to n-hexane. No 2,5-HD was detected in the urine of the non-exposed subjects under the analytical conditions with no hydrolysis. Thus, the analysis without hydrolysis was considered to be the method of choice from the viewpoint of simplicity in analytical procedures, sensitive separation of the exposed from the non-exposed, and quantitative increase in the amount of 2,5-HD after n-hexane exposure.
为确定将尿中2,5 -己二酮(2,5 - HD)作为职业性接触正己烷指标的首选分析方法,在三种水解条件下,即pH 4.8的酶促水解、pH 0.5的酸水解以及不进行水解,对36名接触正己烷的男性工人和30名未接触的男性工人的下班时尿液样本进行了2,5 - HD分析。将由此测定的2,5 - HD浓度与通过扩散采样测得的正己烷8小时时间加权平均接触浓度进行相关性检验。回归分析表明,未经任何水解的2,5 - HD浓度与正己烷接触强度的相关性最佳。在不进行水解的分析条件下,未接触者的尿液中未检测到2,5 - HD。因此,从分析程序简便、能灵敏区分接触者与未接触者以及正己烷接触后2,5 - HD量的定量增加等角度考虑,不进行水解的分析方法被认为是首选方法。