Kepler T B, Perelson A S
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-8203, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8219-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8219.
It has become clear that many organisms possess the ability to regulate their mutation rate in response to environmental conditions. So the question of finding an optimal mutation rate must be replaced by that of finding an optimal mutation schedule. We show that this task cannot be accomplished with standard population-dynamic models. We then develop a "hybrid" model for populations experiencing time-dependent mutation that treats population growth as deterministic but the time of first appearance of new variants as stochastic. We show that the hybrid model agrees well with a Monte Carlo simulation. From this model, we derive a deterministic approximation, a "threshold" model, that is similar to standard population dynamic models but differs in the initial rate of generation of new mutants. We use these techniques to model antibody affinity maturation by somatic hypermutation. We had previously shown that the optimal mutation schedule for the deterministic threshold model is phasic, with periods of mutation between intervals of mutation-free growth. To establish the validity of this schedule, we now show that the phasic schedule that optimizes the deterministic threshold model significantly improves upon the best constant-rate schedule for the hybrid and Monte Carlo models.
很明显,许多生物体具备根据环境条件调节其突变率的能力。因此,寻找最优突变率的问题必须被寻找最优突变时间表的问题所取代。我们表明,使用标准的种群动态模型无法完成这项任务。然后,我们为经历时间依赖性突变的种群开发了一个“混合”模型,该模型将种群增长视为确定性的,但新变体首次出现的时间视为随机的。我们表明,混合模型与蒙特卡罗模拟结果吻合得很好。从这个模型中,我们推导出一个确定性近似,即一个“阈值”模型,它类似于标准的种群动态模型,但在新突变体产生的初始速率上有所不同。我们使用这些技术来模拟通过体细胞超突变实现的抗体亲和力成熟。我们之前已经表明,确定性阈值模型的最优突变时间表是阶段性的,在无突变生长的间隔期之间存在突变期。为了确定这个时间表的有效性,我们现在表明,优化确定性阈值模型的阶段性时间表比混合模型和蒙特卡罗模型的最佳恒定速率时间表有显著改进。