Braggion C, Cappelletti L M, Cornacchia M, Zanolla L, Mastella G
Cystic Fibrosis Center, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995 Jan;19(1):16-22. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950190104.
The aim of our study was to compare the short-term efficacy of three different chest physiotherapy (CPT) regimens (PD, postural drainage; PEP, positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy; HFCC, high-frequency chest compression physiotherapy) on patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) hospitalized for an acute pulmonary exacerbation. Sixteen patients with CF, 8 males, 8 females, aged 15-27 years (mean, 20.3 +/- 4), met the inclusion criteria: 1) age over 14 years; 2) mild or moderate airway obstruction; 3) sputum volume > 30 mL/day; 4) being proficient in PD and PEP CPT. Patients at admission had (mean +/- SD) forced volume in 1 second (FEV1) 52.2 +/- 21.9 percent predicted; Shwachman-Kulczycki clinical score 65.1 +/- 11 points; Chrispin-Norman chest radiography score 18.6 +/- 4.3 points. The three CPT regimens and a control-treatment (CONT) were administered in a random sequence, each patient receiving each treatment twice a day (in 50 minute sessions) for 2 consecutive days. During CONT and for 30 minutes after each session only spontaneous coughing was allowed. Wet and dry weight of sputum were recorded during the 50-minute sessions and 30 minutes afterward. Lung function was measured before and 30 minutes after each session. For each treatment a score was given by the patient for efficacy, and by both the patient and the physiotherapist for tolerance. Wet and dry weights of sputum collected during the sessions were greater for all CPT regimens than for CONT (P < 0.001, P < 0.0001). No significant differences between the three CPT regimens for both wet and dry weights were found when the number of coughs was taken into account.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们研究的目的是比较三种不同胸部物理治疗(CPT)方案(PD,体位引流;PEP,呼气末正压物理治疗;HFCC,高频胸部按压物理治疗)对因急性肺部加重而住院的囊性纤维化(CF)患者的短期疗效。16例CF患者,8例男性,8例女性,年龄15 - 27岁(平均20.3±4岁),符合纳入标准:1)年龄超过14岁;2)轻度或中度气道阻塞;3)痰量>30 mL/天;4)熟练掌握PD和PEP CPT。入院时患者的第1秒用力容积(FEV1)为预计值的52.2±21.9%;Shwachman-Kulczycki临床评分为65.1±11分;Chrispin-Norman胸部X线评分18.6±4.3分。三种CPT方案和一种对照治疗(CONT)以随机顺序进行,每位患者每天接受每种治疗两次(每次50分钟),连续进行2天。在CONT期间以及每次治疗后30分钟内,仅允许自主咳嗽。在50分钟的治疗期间及之后30分钟记录痰液的湿重和干重。在每次治疗前和治疗后30分钟测量肺功能。患者对每种治疗的疗效进行评分,患者和物理治疗师对耐受性进行评分。所有CPT方案在治疗期间收集的痰液湿重和干重均高于CONT(P < 0.001,P < 0.0001)。当考虑咳嗽次数时,三种CPT方案在痰液湿重和干重方面均未发现显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)