Tek C, Uluğ B, Rezaki B G, Tanriverdi N, Mercan S, Demir B, Vargel S
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995 Jun;91(6):410-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09801.x.
Fifteen patients with DSM-III-R diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were rated according to the Turkish version of the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the US National Institute of Mental Health Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale (NIMH-GOCS) by 7 raters independently from audiotaped interviews. Patients also completed the Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (MOCI). Interrater reliability of Y-BOCS and NIMH-GOCS were very good as well as correlations between these two scales. The correlations of MOCI with Y-BOCS and NIMH-GOCS were not significant. We found Y-BOCS and NIMH-GOCS to be reliable and valid instruments in assessing the severity of OCD. These findings suggest that MOCI may not be a suitable instrument for assessing the severity of OCD.
15名被诊断为DSM-III-R强迫症（OCD）的患者，由7名评估者根据耶鲁布朗强迫症量表（Y-BOCS）的土耳其语版本和美国国立精神卫生研究所全球强迫症量表（NIMH-GOCS），通过对录音访谈进行独立评估。患者还完成了莫兹利强迫症量表（MOCI）。Y-BOCS和NIMH-GOCS的评估者间信度以及这两个量表之间的相关性都非常好。MOCI与Y-BOCS和NIMH-GOCS的相关性不显著。我们发现Y-BOCS和NIMH-GOCS是评估强迫症严重程度的可靠且有效的工具。这些发现表明，MOCI可能不是评估强迫症严重程度的合适工具。
