• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

床边配给制令人难以承受的正确性。成本控制环境下医生的职责。

The unbearable rightness of bedside rationing. Physician duties in a climate of cost containment.

作者信息

Ubel P A, Arnold R M

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1995 Sep 25;155(17):1837-42.

PMID:7677549
Abstract

A local internist is in the process of ordering an intravenous pyelogram for a patient she suspects of having kidney problems, when a medical student shadowing her in clinic interrupts. The student wants to know why the physician is not ordering a low-osmolality contrast agent for the patient, having read that they are less likely to cause serious side effects than high-osmolality contrast agents. The physician realizes that the medical student is correct, but rejects the suggestion, telling the student that "low-osmolality contrast agents are the standard of care for low-risk patients."

摘要

一位当地的内科医生正在为一名她怀疑有肾脏问题的患者安排静脉肾盂造影检查,这时一名在诊所跟随她实习的医科学生打断了她。该学生想知道为什么医生没有为患者开低渗性造影剂,因为他读到过低渗性造影剂比高渗性造影剂引起严重副作用的可能性更小。医生意识到医科学生是正确的,但拒绝了这个建议,告诉学生“低渗性造影剂是低风险患者的标准治疗方法”。

相似文献

1
The unbearable rightness of bedside rationing. Physician duties in a climate of cost containment.床边配给制令人难以承受的正确性。成本控制环境下医生的职责。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Sep 25;155(17):1837-42.
2
Potential legal liability in the allocation of scarce health care resources.
Health Law Can. 1994;14(4):95-107.
3
Ethics by the numbers: monitoring physicians' integrity in managed care.数字中的伦理:监管管理式医疗中医生的诚信
J Clin Ethics. 1998 Fall;9(3):297-305.
4
Liability in the allocation of scarce health care resources.稀缺医疗资源分配中的责任。
Health Law Can. 1996 Feb;16(3):65-77.
5
Strains in the fiduciary metaphor: divided physician loyalties and obligations in a changing health care system.信托隐喻中的张力:不断变化的医疗体系中医生忠诚度与义务的分化
Am J Law Med. 1995;21(2-3):241-57.
6
Trust and informed consent to rationing.对配给的信任与知情同意。
Milbank Q. 1994;72(2):217-23.
7
Impact of cost containment measures on medical liability.成本控制措施对医疗责任的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;12(6):595-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00623.x.
8
Medical ethics cases: moral conflict or confusion?医学伦理案例:道德冲突还是困惑?
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Fall;4(3):270-1.
9
Fiscal scarcity and the inevitability of bedside budget balancing.财政短缺与床边预算平衡的必然性。
Arch Intern Med. 1989 May;149(5):1012-5.
10
Clinical practice guidelines as tools of public policy: conflicts of purpose, issues of autonomy, and justice.作为公共政策工具的临床实践指南:目的冲突、自主性问题与正义问题
J Clin Ethics. 1994 Winter;5(4):303-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician "rationing".背景与规模:改善关于医生“配给”问题辩论的区分标准
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13010-017-0048-6.
2
Pediatric asthma severity score is associated with critical care interventions.儿童哮喘严重程度评分与重症监护干预措施相关。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):34-39. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v6.i1.34.
3
Rationing conscience.定量配给的良知。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):226-229. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103795. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
4
Ethical considerations for the clinical oncologist in an era of oncology drug shortages.肿瘤药物短缺时代临床肿瘤学家的伦理考虑
Oncologist. 2014 Feb;19(2):186-92. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0301. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
5
The moral psychology of rationing among physicians: the role of harm and fairness intuitions in physician objections to cost-effectiveness and cost-containment.医生之间资源分配的道德心理学:伤害与公平直觉在医生反对成本效益和成本控制中的作用。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013 Sep 8;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-8-13.
6
Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework.评估患者对延长生命治疗的请求:伦理框架。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Nov;38(11):647-51. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100333. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
In a survey, marked inconsistency in how oncologists judged value of high-cost cancer drugs in relation to gains in survival.在一项调查中,肿瘤学家在判断高成本癌症药物的价值与生存获益方面存在显著的不一致。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):709-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0251.
8
Health systems and sustainability: doctors and consumers differ on threats and solutions.卫生系统与可持续性:医生和消费者对威胁和解决方案的看法存在分歧。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 27;6(4):e19222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019222.
9
Physician conceptions of responsibility to individual patients and distributive justice in health care.医生对个体患者的责任观念以及医疗保健中的分配正义。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):53-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.257.
10
Public response to cost-quality tradeoffs in clinical decisions.公众对临床决策中成本-质量权衡的反应。
Med Decis Making. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):369-78. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256882.