Denekamp J
CRC Gray Laboratory, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1993 Mar;66(783):181-96. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-783-181.
A body of evidence that vascular-mediated damage occurs in murine tumours after many existing forms of anti-tumour therapy is rapidly accumulating (see Gray Conference Proceedings edited by Moore & West, 1991). Rapid conventional screens of cells in vitro or using leukaemias of lymphomas will not detect this mode of action and such screens will therefore miss effective agents. A change in the approach to experimental cancer therapy is needed to ensure that this important new avenue is fully investigated. Solid tumours will need to be studied and the importance of specific tumour cell biochemistry (e.g. on tissue factor procoagulant activity), of endothelial status and the immunocompetence of the host are all likely to be important. It is a subject of considerable debate at present whether transplanted subcutaneous mouse tumours are adequate models and whether they will reflect the response of spontaneous tumours, or even of transplants into other sites. Xenografts are not likely to be appropriate if the immuno-suppressed hosts lack the cells needed for the cytokine component of the pathway. The strategy of design and screening of new agents, for scheduling of existing agents and particularly the sequencing of adjunctive therapies are likely to be completely different for the "direct" tumor cell or "indirect" vascular-mediated approaches. It may eventually be appropriate to combine vascular manipulation with direct cytotoxicity aimed at malignant cells but the two mechanisms must be recognized as distinct entities and considered separately before attempting to coordinate them. It is important therefore to identify the "hallmarks" of vascular mediated injury and the means by which this can be distinguished from direct cell kill. These may be detectable in the tumour response but clues can also be gained from the side effects that are seen in normal tissues both with existing and with novel therapies (Figure 7). The appeal of vascular-mediated ischaemic therapy is that it is systemic and will have the potential of being effective on any tumour with a newly evoked vascular network, i.e. of about 1 mm in diameter, but it will be even more effective on large tumours than on small. Thus it should affect both large primary tumours and disseminated small metastases. The studies with many different anti-cancer agents have illustrated the potential complexity of responses that can appear to cause tumour cell death by collapse or occlusion of the blood supply. They have also focused attention on features of disparate agents, e.g. TNF, FAA, PDT, which may share similar pathways. No single feature of neovasculature can be highlighted as the sole route by which such antivascular therapy should be targeted. Rapid proliferation of the endothelial cells may prove to be a target, but it also influences differentiation characteristics, so that the immature cells will function abnormally. The permeability of these poorly formed vessels may lead to extravasation of proteins leading to increase interstitial pressures and by this means to an imbalance between intravascular and extravascular pressures and hence to collapse of the thin-walled vessels. Changes in systemic blood pressure, cardiac output, viscosity or coagulation and especially a redistribution of regional perfusion would all have differential effects in tumours and normal vessels. Clearly both vascular patho-physiology and the complexity of endothelial cell function and its imbalance in neovasculature will be important in understanding the mechanism of action of antivascular strategies. This very challenging boundary between oncology and a number of other medical and biological fields promises to lead to altered attitudes to existing therapies and the discovery of completely new classes of anti-cancer agents. The next decade should translate into clinical benefit for patients if the progress in this field continues to be as rapid as it has been in the late eighties. We must now determine what characteristics make one tumour more sensitive than another to agents such as heat, PDT, cytokines and FAA, and learn how to extrapolate from those rodent tumours to the human.
大量证据表明,在许多现有形式的抗肿瘤治疗后,小鼠肿瘤中会发生血管介导的损伤,且这一证据正在迅速积累(见摩尔和韦斯特编辑的《格雷会议论文集》,1991年)。在体外对细胞进行快速常规筛选或使用淋巴瘤白血病进行筛选,将无法检测到这种作用模式,因此此类筛选会遗漏有效的药物。需要改变实验性癌症治疗的方法,以确保对这一重要的新途径进行充分研究。需要对实体瘤进行研究,特定肿瘤细胞生物化学(如组织因子促凝活性)、内皮细胞状态以及宿主免疫能力的重要性都可能至关重要。目前,移植的皮下小鼠肿瘤是否是合适的模型,以及它们是否能反映自发肿瘤甚至移植到其他部位的肿瘤的反应,是一个存在相当大争议的问题。如果免疫抑制宿主缺乏该途径细胞因子成分所需的细胞,异种移植可能不合适。对于“直接”肿瘤细胞或“间接”血管介导方法,新药设计和筛选策略、现有药物的给药方案,尤其是辅助治疗的顺序可能会完全不同。最终,将血管操作与针对恶性细胞的直接细胞毒性相结合可能是合适的,但在尝试协调这两种机制之前,必须将它们视为不同的实体并分别加以考虑。因此,识别血管介导损伤的“特征”以及将其与直接细胞杀伤区分开来的方法很重要。这些可能在肿瘤反应中可检测到,但也可以从现有疗法和新疗法在正常组织中出现的副作用中获得线索(图7)。血管介导的缺血治疗的吸引力在于它是全身性的,对任何具有新形成的血管网络(即直径约1毫米)的肿瘤都有潜在的疗效,而且对大肿瘤的效果比对小肿瘤更好。因此,它应该对大的原发性肿瘤和播散性小转移瘤都有影响。对许多不同抗癌药物的研究表明,通过血液供应的崩溃或阻塞似乎导致肿瘤细胞死亡的反应可能具有潜在的复杂性。这些研究还将注意力集中在不同药物的特征上,如肿瘤坏死因子、脂肪酸、光动力疗法,它们可能有相似的途径。新生血管的任何单一特征都不能被突出作为这种抗血管治疗的唯一靶向途径。内皮细胞的快速增殖可能被证明是一个靶点,但它也会影响分化特征,从而使未成熟细胞功能异常。这些结构不良的血管的通透性可能导致蛋白质外渗,导致间质压力增加,进而导致血管内和血管外压力失衡,从而导致薄壁血管塌陷。全身血压、心输出量、粘度或凝血的变化,尤其是区域灌注的重新分布,在肿瘤和正常血管中都会产生不同的影响。显然,血管病理生理学以及内皮细胞功能的复杂性及其在新生血管中的失衡,对于理解抗血管策略的作用机制都很重要。肿瘤学与许多其他医学和生物学领域之间这个极具挑战性的界限,有望改变对现有疗法的态度,并发现全新类别的抗癌药物。如果该领域继续像八十年代后期那样迅速发展,未来十年应该会给患者带来临床益处。我们现在必须确定哪些特征使一种肿瘤比另一种肿瘤对热、光动力疗法、细胞因子和脂肪酸等药物更敏感,并学会如何从那些啮齿动物肿瘤推断到人类肿瘤。