Sugino K, Kure Y, Ozaki O, Ito K, Matsumoto A
Ito Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Surg Today. 1993;23(9):791-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00311621.
Eighty-four patients with locally advanced thyroid cancer treated during the period from 1965 to 1989 were studied in order to evaluate the appropriateness of radical surgery. There were 57 patients who underwent palliative surgery (palliative group) and 27 patients who underwent radical surgery (radical group). Forty-six of the patients in the palliative group and all 27 in the radical group were aged 40 years or more. The survival rates as analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method revealed no significant difference between patients aged 40 or more in the palliative group and those in the radical group. The control of local disease, however, was much more difficult in the palliative group. From the view of survival rates, the superiority of radical surgery could not be demonstrated, but radical surgery did control local neck disease better. In the palliative group, the survival rate of patients aged under 40 was significantly better than that of patients aged 40 or more. It may thus be better to avoid radical surgery in patients under 40 if it would result in a severe deterioration in their quality of life.
为了评估根治性手术的合理性,我们对1965年至1989年期间接受治疗的84例局部晚期甲状腺癌患者进行了研究。其中57例患者接受了姑息性手术(姑息组),27例患者接受了根治性手术(根治组)。姑息组中的46例患者以及根治组中的所有27例患者年龄均在40岁及以上。采用Kaplan-Meier方法分析的生存率显示,姑息组中40岁及以上患者与根治组中40岁及以上患者之间无显著差异。然而,姑息组中局部疾病的控制要困难得多。从生存率来看,根治性手术的优势未能得到证实,但根治性手术确实能更好地控制颈部局部疾病。在姑息组中,40岁以下患者的生存率明显高于40岁及以上患者。因此,如果会导致40岁以下患者的生活质量严重下降,最好避免对其进行根治性手术。