Gannon P F, Bright P, Campbell M, O'Hickey S P, Burge P S
Occupational Lung Disease Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, UK.
Thorax. 1995 Feb;50(2):156-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.2.156.
Glutaraldehyde is the best disinfectant for fibreoptic endoscopes. It is also used in the processing of x ray films. A number of studies have reported eye, nose, and respiratory symptoms in exposed workers. Three individual case reports of occupational asthma in endoscopy workers and a radiographer have also been published. We describe a further seven cases of occupational asthma due to glutaraldehyde in endoscopy and x ray departments, together with exposure levels measured during the challenge tests and in 19 endoscopy and x ray departments in the region.
Eight workers were referred for investigation of suspected occupational asthma following direct or indirect exposure to glutaraldehyde at work. They were investigated by serial measurements of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and specific bronchial provocation tests. Glutaraldehyde levels were measured using personal and static short and longer term air samples during the challenge tests and in 13 endoscopy units and six x ray darkrooms in the region where concern about glutaraldehyde exposure had been expressed. Three of the workers investigated with occupational asthma came from departments where glutaraldehyde air measurements had been made; the others came from other hospitals or departments.
The diagnosis of occupational asthma was confirmed in seven workers, all of whom had PEF records suggestive of occupational asthma and positive specific bronchial challenge tests to glutaraldehyde. Bronchial provocation testing was negative in one worker who was no longer exposed and who had a less clearcut history of occupational asthma. Three workers also had a positive specific bronchial challenge to formaldehyde. The mean level of glutaraldehyde in air during the challenge tests was 0.068 mg/m3, about one tenth of the short term occupational exposure standard of 0.7 mg/m3. The levels obtained in the challenge chamber were similar to those measured in 13 endoscopy suites and six x ray darkrooms where median short term levels were 0.16 mg/m3 during decantation in endoscopy suites and < 0.009 mg/m3 in darkrooms.
Glutaraldehyde can cause occupational asthma. The exposure levels measured in the workplace suggest that sensitisation may occur at levels below the current occupational exposure standard.
戊二醛是纤维光学内窥镜的最佳消毒剂。它也用于X线胶片的处理。多项研究报告了接触戊二醛的工人出现眼部、鼻部和呼吸道症状。还发表了3例内镜检查工作人员和1例放射技师职业性哮喘的个案报告。我们描述了内镜检查和X线科室另外7例因戊二醛导致的职业性哮喘病例,以及在激发试验期间和该地区19个内镜检查和X线科室所测得的接触水平。
8名工人因工作中直接或间接接触戊二醛后被转诊进行疑似职业性哮喘调查。通过连续测量呼气峰值流速(PEF)和特异性支气管激发试验对他们进行调查。在激发试验期间以及在该地区13个内镜检查科室和6个X线暗室(这些地方已表达了对戊二醛接触的担忧),使用个人和静态短期及长期空气样本测量戊二醛水平。接受职业性哮喘调查的3名工人来自已进行戊二醛空气测量的科室;其他工人来自其他医院或科室。
7名工人被确诊为职业性哮喘,他们所有人的PEF记录均提示职业性哮喘,且对戊二醛的特异性支气管激发试验呈阳性。1名不再接触戊二醛且职业性哮喘病史不那么明确的工人,其支气管激发试验为阴性。3名工人对甲醛的特异性支气管激发试验也呈阳性。激发试验期间空气中戊二醛的平均水平为0.068毫克/立方米,约为0.7毫克/立方米短期职业接触标准的十分之一。激发试验舱内测得的水平与在13个内镜检查室和6个X线暗室中测得的水平相似,在内镜检查室倾倒期间短期水平中位数为0.16毫克/立方米,在暗室中<0.009毫克/立方米。
戊二醛可导致职业性哮喘。工作场所测得的接触水平表明,在低于当前职业接触标准的水平下可能发生致敏。