Suppr超能文献

新西兰的婴儿猝死综合征:风险评分有用吗?新西兰国家婴儿床死亡研究小组。

Sudden infant death syndrome in New Zealand: are risk scores useful? New Zealand National Cot Death Study Group.

作者信息

Williams S M, Taylor B J, Mitchell E A, Scragg R, Ford R P, Stewart A W

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago Medical School, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):94-101. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.1.94.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Christchurch, Invercargill, Dunedin (CID) and Oxford record linkage study (ORLS) risk scores in five regions of New Zealand and examine the effect of risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), such as prone sleeping position, maternal smoking, breast feeding, measures of illness, the use of antenatal classes, community health care, and medical services on a high and low risk group delineated by the CID score.

DESIGN

This was a case-control study of infants dying of SIDS.

SETTING

Both the cases and controls were born in one of five health districts in New Zealand and their parents were interviewed between 1 November 1987 and 31 October 1990.

PARTICIPANTS

The cases were 485 infants who died of SIDS. The controls were a random sample drawn from the same five regions in which the cases were born, chosen so that their age on the day on which they were interviewed was similar to the age at death of the cases. Risk scores were calculated for 387 case and 1579 controls.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Using the recommended cut off points the sensitivity and specificity of the CID and ORLS were found to be similar to those described for other samples. The differences among the regions were significant. There was, however, no evidence that the association between SIDS and the risk factors considered was different in the high and low risk groups delineated by the CID score. The relative attributable risk for smoking was 32.3% in the high risk group. The excess risk that could be attributed to a different prevalence of any of the other risk factors in the high risk group was small when compared with the low risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care resources should be spent on promoting and evaluating good child care practices for all, rather than identifying and promoting special interventions for those in the high risk category.

摘要

研究目的

评估新西兰五个地区的克赖斯特彻奇、因弗卡吉尔、达尼丁(CID)记录链接研究和牛津记录链接研究(ORLS)风险评分,并研究婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)风险因素的影响,如俯卧睡眠姿势、母亲吸烟、母乳喂养、疾病指标、产前课程的使用、社区医疗保健以及医疗服务对由CID评分划定的高风险和低风险组的影响。

设计

这是一项关于死于SIDS的婴儿的病例对照研究。

背景

病例和对照均出生于新西兰五个健康区之一,其父母在1987年11月1日至1990年10月31日期间接受了访谈。

参与者

病例为485名死于SIDS的婴儿。对照是从病例出生的相同五个地区中随机抽取的样本,选取的对照在接受访谈当天的年龄与病例死亡时的年龄相似。为387例病例和1579名对照计算了风险评分。

测量与主要结果

使用推荐的临界点,发现CID和ORLS的敏感性和特异性与其他样本中描述的相似。各地区之间的差异具有显著性。然而,没有证据表明在由CID评分划定的高风险和低风险组中,SIDS与所考虑的风险因素之间的关联有所不同。高风险组中吸烟的相对归因风险为32.3%。与低风险组相比,高风险组中可归因于任何其他风险因素不同患病率的额外风险较小。

结论

医疗保健资源应花在为所有人推广和评估良好的儿童护理做法上,而不是为高风险类别者确定和推广特殊干预措施。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
The epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome.婴儿猝死综合征的流行病学
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1982 Mar;36(1):17-21. doi: 10.1136/jech.36.1.17.
7
Prediction of sudden infant death syndrome: an independent evaluation of four scoring methods.
Stat Med. 1986 Mar-Apr;5(2):113-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780050203.
8
Evaluation of the Nottingham birth scoring system.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;533:106-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb37238.x.
10
Assessing agreement.
Med J Aust. 1989 Apr 3;150(7):384-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136531.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验