Gustafson G, Vicini F, Freedman L, Johnston E, Edmundson G, Sherman S, Pursel S, Komic M, Chen P, Borrego J C
Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA.
Cancer. 1995 May 1;75(9):2345-50. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2345::aid-cncr2820750925>3.0.co;2-m.
The clinical, radiographic, and bronchoscopic records of patients treated with out-patient high dose rate (HDR) endobronchial brachytherapy were reviewed to determine its effectiveness in patients with malignant airway obstruction (with or without prior external beam radiation). In addition, quality of life and acute and chronic morbidity were evaluated.
From January 1, 1989 to June 30, 1993, 46 patients received 128 HDR endobronchial treatments employing a high activity Ir-192 source with a remote afterloader. Patients treated had a total of 22 primary and 17 recurrent bronchogenic carcinomas, 7 of which were metastatic nonpulmonary tumors. Three separate fractions of 7.0 Gy were prescribed to a depth of 1.0 cm. and given 1 week apart. Twelve patients (30%) received prior external beam irradiation (median dose, 58 Gy).
Median follow-up for the entire group was 5 months (17.5 for surviving patients). Of the eight asymptomatic patients, five (62%) remained asymptomatic for the remainder of their lives. Of the 38 symptomatic patients, 28 (74%) had significant clinical improvement, and 12 of them remained improved for the duration of their lives. Of thirty-six (78%) patients examined for radiographic response, 25 (69%) had a partial or complete response to this treatment. In patients without prior irradiation, there was a tendency for a higher percentage of clinical and radiographic response. Two patients (4%) experienced mild, transient dysphagia, four patients developed self-limited radiation pneumonitis (9%), and three patients (7%) suffered fatal hemoptysis (all of these patients received prior or concurrent external beam radiotherapy). No factor (i.e., prior radiation therapy, number of catheters placed, surgery, or chemotherapy) predicted an increased risk of complications (P = NS).
Outpatient HDR endobronchial brachytherapy is effective in both preventing and relieving endobronchial obstruction in patients with or without prior irradiation, recurrent lesions, or metastatic nonpulmonary disease. A significant proportion of patients can be rendered asymptomatic for the duration of their lives, hence were provided with improved quality of life. These treatments are well tolerated and safe, and result in minimal long term morbidity.
回顾接受门诊高剂量率(HDR)支气管内近距离放射治疗患者的临床、影像学和支气管镜检查记录,以确定其对恶性气道阻塞患者(无论有无既往外照射)的有效性。此外,对生活质量以及急慢性发病率进行了评估。
1989年1月1日至1993年6月30日,46例患者接受了128次使用高活度铱-192源及遥控后装设备的HDR支气管内治疗。接受治疗的患者共有22例原发性和17例复发性支气管源性癌,其中7例为转移性非肺部肿瘤。规定在1.0 cm深度给予三个7.0 Gy的分次照射,间隔1周。12例患者(30%)接受过既往外照射(中位剂量58 Gy)。
整个组的中位随访时间为5个月(存活患者为17.5个月)。8例无症状患者中,5例(62%)在余生保持无症状。38例有症状的患者中,28例(74%)有显著临床改善,其中12例在余生一直保持改善。在接受影像学反应检查的36例(78%)患者中,25例(69%)对该治疗有部分或完全反应。在未接受过照射的患者中,临床和影像学反应的百分比有更高的趋势。2例患者(4%)出现轻度、短暂的吞咽困难,4例患者发生自限性放射性肺炎(9%),3例患者(7%)死于咯血(所有这些患者均接受过既往或同期外照射放疗)。没有因素(即既往放疗、放置导管数量、手术或化疗)预示并发症风险增加(P = 无显著性差异)。
门诊HDR支气管内近距离放射治疗对于有或无既往照射、复发病变或转移性非肺部疾病的患者,在预防和缓解支气管内阻塞方面均有效。相当一部分患者在余生可保持无症状,从而生活质量得到改善。这些治疗耐受性良好且安全,长期发病率极低。