Modi P, Gresh W, Shih K
Pilkington Barnes Hind, Sunnyvale, CA 94086.
CLAO J. 1995 Jan;21(1):24-6.
We compared the antimicrobial activities of two rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens care systems, a one-step wetting and soaking system (0.005% chlorhexidine gluconate, 0.02% EDTA) and a conditioning solution (0.006% chlorhexidine gluconate, 0.05% EDTA). The formulations were individually inoculated with approximately 10(6) CFU/mL of a pathogenic organism. Both the one-step wetting and soaking system and the conditioning solution demonstrated good antimicrobial efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Serratia marcescens, and Aspergillus fumigatus. However, the one-step wetting and soaking system provides better disinfection against Candida albicans (1.2 log reduction in 4 hours) than the conditioning solution (0.39 log reduction in 4 hours). The one-step system also reduced S. marcescens by 5 logs in 1 hour, whereas the conditioning solution reduced S. marcescens by about 2 logs only in the same time interval. Although both RGP lens care systems use the same active preservative (chlorhexidine digluconate), the variation in disinfecting activities may be attributed to differences in formulation and buffer systems.
我们比较了两种硬性透气性(RGP)隐形眼镜护理系统的抗菌活性,一种是一步式湿润和浸泡系统(0.005%葡萄糖酸洗必泰,0.02%乙二胺四乙酸)和一种护理液(0.006%葡萄糖酸洗必泰,0.05%乙二胺四乙酸)。将这些制剂分别接种约10(6) CFU/mL的致病生物体。一步式湿润和浸泡系统以及护理液对铜绿假单胞菌、表皮葡萄球菌、粘质沙雷氏菌和烟曲霉均显示出良好的抗菌效果。然而,一步式湿润和浸泡系统对白色念珠菌的消毒效果(4小时内减少1.2个对数)优于护理液(4小时内减少0.39个对数)。一步式系统在1小时内还能使粘质沙雷氏菌减少5个对数,而护理液在相同时间间隔内仅能使粘质沙雷氏菌减少约2个对数。尽管两种RGP隐形眼镜护理系统都使用相同的活性防腐剂(葡萄糖酸氯己定),但消毒活性的差异可能归因于配方和缓冲系统的不同。