Jatzko G R, Lisborg P H, Pertl A M, Stettner H M
Surgical Department, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, St. Veit/Glan, Austria.
Ann Surg. 1995 Apr;221(4):381-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199504000-00008.
To answer the question whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or open cholecystectomy (OC) is safer in terms of complications, the authors evaluated complications relating to 1440 cholecystectomies performed by the same surgeons in a retrospective study.
A definite pronouncement on whether LC truly is superior to OC is not possible because prospective trials are burdened with problems of recruitment.
After the introduction of LC at the authors' institution in April 1991 and until October 1993, 94.6% (700/740) of all patients admitted for operation because of symptomatic gallstone disease could be treated laparoscopically. The clinical records of the last 700 patients who underwent OC before the introduction of LC were re-evaluated with regard to both overall complications and the grade of complication (severity grade 1-4). A comparison of the incidence of complications relating to the two surgical methods, age, sex, common bile duct stones, acute cholecystitis, concomitant illness, Apache score, and length of operation was calculated by multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model.
The total rate of complications in the OC group was 7.7%, with five postoperative deaths, compared with 1.9% and one postoperative death in the LC group. Multivariate analysis for OC revealed that both old age (p = 0.014) and the existence of common bile duct stones (p = 0.02) had independent prognostic influences in increasing the overall complication rate, whereas only old age (p = 0.019) influenced the overall complication rate after LC. Multivariate analysis of all cholecystectomies (n = 1440) showed that the overall complication rate was influenced independently by OC as a detrimental factor.
As this analysis emphasizes, LC can be performed safely with an overall complication rate that is distinctly lower than that of OC. For selective surgery, LC is undoubtedly superior to OC and can probably be seen as a new "gold standard" for cholecystectomies.
为了回答在并发症方面腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)或开腹胆囊切除术(OC)哪种更安全的问题,作者在一项回顾性研究中评估了由同一批外科医生实施的1440例胆囊切除术的相关并发症。
由于前瞻性试验存在招募方面的问题,因此无法对LC是否真的优于OC做出明确论断。
自1991年4月作者所在机构引入LC后至1993年10月,因有症状胆结石疾病入院接受手术的所有患者中,94.6%(700/740)能够接受腹腔镜治疗。对在引入LC之前接受OC的最后700例患者的临床记录,就总体并发症和并发症分级(严重程度1 - 4级)进行重新评估。通过使用逻辑回归模型的多变量分析,计算了与两种手术方法、年龄、性别、胆总管结石、急性胆囊炎、伴随疾病、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(Apache)评分以及手术时长相关的并发症发生率。
OC组的总体并发症发生率为7.7%,有5例术后死亡,而LC组分别为1.9%和1例术后死亡。对OC的多变量分析显示,高龄(p = 0.014)和存在胆总管结石(p = 0.02)在增加总体并发症发生率方面均具有独立的预后影响,而在LC后只有高龄(p = 0.019)影响总体并发症发生率。对所有胆囊切除术(n = 1440)的多变量分析表明,OC作为有害因素独立影响总体并发症发生率。
正如本分析所强调的,LC能够安全实施,其总体并发症发生率明显低于OC。对于选择性手术,LC无疑优于OC,并且可能可视作胆囊切除术的新“金标准”。