Hedén B, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L, Rittner R, Pahlm O, Peterson C
Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Sweden.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 May 1;75(14):929-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80689-4.
Misplacement of electrodes during the recording of an electrocardiogram (ECG) can cause an incorrect interpretation, misdiagnosis, and subsequent lack of proper treatment. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to develop artificial neural networks that yield peak sensitivity for the recognition of right/left arm lead reversal at a very high specificity; and (2) to compare the performances of the networks with those of 2 widely used rule-based interpretation programs. The study was based on 11,009 ECGs recorded in patients at an emergency department using computerized electrocardiographs. Each of the ECGs was used to computationally generate an ECG with right/left arm lead reversal. Neural networks were trained to detect ECGs with right/left arm lead reversal. Different networks and rule-based criteria were used depending on the presence or absence of P waves. The networks and the criteria all showed a very high specificity (99.87% to 100%). The neural networks performed better than the rule-based criteria, both when P waves were present (sensitivity 99.1%) or absent (sensitivity 94.5%). The corresponding sensitivities for the best criteria were 93.9% and 39.3%, respectively. An estimated 300 million ECGs are recorded annually in the world. The majority of these recordings are performed using computerized electrocardiographs, which include algorithms for detection of right/left arm lead reversals. In this study, neural networks performed better than conventional algorithms and the differences in sensitivity could result in 100,000 to 400,000 right/left arm lead reversals being detected by networks but not by conventional interpretation programs.
在心电图(ECG)记录过程中电极位置放置错误会导致解读错误、误诊以及后续缺乏恰当治疗。本研究的目的有两个:(1)开发人工神经网络,在非常高的特异性下对识别右/左臂导联反转产生峰值敏感性;(2)将这些网络的性能与两个广泛使用的基于规则的解读程序的性能进行比较。该研究基于在急诊科使用计算机化心电图仪记录的11,009份患者心电图。每份心电图都通过计算生成一份存在右/左臂导联反转的心电图。训练神经网络以检测存在右/左臂导联反转的心电图。根据P波的有无使用不同的网络和基于规则的标准。这些网络和标准都显示出非常高的特异性(99.87%至100%)。当存在P波(敏感性99.1%)或不存在P波(敏感性94.5%)时,神经网络的表现均优于基于规则的标准。最佳标准对应的敏感性分别为93.9%和39.3%。据估计,全球每年记录约3亿份心电图。这些记录中的大多数是使用计算机化心电图仪进行的,其中包括检测右/左臂导联反转的算法。在本研究中,神经网络的表现优于传统算法,敏感性的差异可能导致网络检测到10万至40万次右/左臂导联反转,而传统解读程序则检测不到。