Schroeder P L, Filler S J, Ramirez B, Lazarchik D A, Vaezi M F, Richter J E
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294-0007, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jun 1;122(11):809-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-11-199506010-00001.
To determine the relation between gastroesophageal reflux disease and dental erosion using ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH testing.
Cross-sectional observational study.
Tertiary referral center.
The dental group consisted of 12 patients with idiopathic dental erosion who were identified by dentists and screened for gastroesophageal reflux disease using 24-hour pH testing. The gastroenterology group consisted of 30 patients who had 24-hour pH testing in the esophageal laboratory and who were referred for dental evaluation (10 did not have reflux, 10 had distal reflux, and 10 had proximal reflux).
24-hour esophageal pH monitoring using a pH probe in the distal and proximal esophagus. Complete dental examination with particular attention to the presence and severity of dental erosion; plaque; gingival damage; and decayed, missing, and filled teeth. Analysis of saliva for pH, flow rates, buffering capacity, and calcium and phosphorus levels. Standardized questionnaire to ascertain possible causes of dental erosion and presence of reflux symptoms.
Ten of the 12 patients in the dental group (83% [95% CI, 52% to 98%]) had gastroesophageal reflux on esophageal pH monitoring. Nine had distal and 7 had proximal reflux. Seven had reflux in the upright position only, 1 had reflux in the supine position only, and 2 had both upright and supine reflux. No saliva abnormalities were found. Ten patients had typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, but dietary or mechanical problems that may have been causing dental erosion were not identified. In the gastroenterology group, upright reflux was seen in 5 of the 10 patients with distal reflux and in all 10 patients with proximal reflux. In addition, 40% of patients in the gastroenterology group (12 of 30) had dental erosion (4 of the 10 with distal reflux [40%], 7 of the 10 with proximal reflux [70%], and only 1 of the 10 without reflux [10%]; P = 0.02 for those with reflux compared with those without reflux). The cumulative dental erosion score correlated with proximal upright reflux when all 24 study patients with erosion were analyzed (r = 0.55 [P < 0.01]); this correlation was even stronger in the subgroup of 12 patients with abnormal amounts of proximal upright reflux (r = 0.84 [P = 0.001]).
Dental erosion is a common finding in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and should be considered an atypical manifestation of this disease.
采用动态24小时食管pH监测确定胃食管反流病与牙侵蚀之间的关系。
横断面观察性研究。
三级转诊中心。
牙科组由12例特发性牙侵蚀患者组成,这些患者由牙医确诊,并通过24小时pH检测筛查胃食管反流病。胃肠病学组由30例在食管实验室进行24小时pH检测并被转诊进行牙科评估的患者组成(10例无反流,10例有远端反流,10例有近端反流)。
使用pH探头在食管远端和近端进行24小时食管pH监测。进行全面的牙科检查,特别注意牙侵蚀的存在和严重程度、牙菌斑、牙龈损伤以及龋齿、缺失牙和补牙情况。分析唾液的pH值、流速、缓冲能力以及钙和磷水平。通过标准化问卷确定牙侵蚀的可能原因和反流症状的存在情况。
牙科组12例患者中有10例(83%[95%CI,52%至98%])在食管pH监测时有胃食管反流。9例有远端反流,7例有近端反流。7例仅在直立位有反流,1例仅在仰卧位有反流,2例在直立位和仰卧位均有反流。未发现唾液异常。10例患者有典型的胃食管反流症状,但未发现可能导致牙侵蚀的饮食或机械问题。在胃肠病学组中,10例有远端反流的患者中有5例出现直立位反流,10例有近端反流的患者均出现直立位反流。此外,胃肠病学组40%的患者(30例中的12例)有牙侵蚀(10例有远端反流的患者中有4例[40%],10例有近端反流的患者中有7例[70%],10例无反流的患者中仅有1例[10%];有反流者与无反流者相比,P = 0.02)。对所有24例有牙侵蚀的研究患者进行分析时,累积牙侵蚀评分与近端直立位反流相关(r = 0.55[P < 0.01]);在近端直立位反流异常量的12例患者亚组中,这种相关性更强(r = 0.84[P = 0.001])。
牙侵蚀在胃食管反流病患者中很常见,应被视为该疾病的一种非典型表现。