• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喝还是不喝:酒精偏好和非偏好大鼠品系的旷场行为

To drink or not to drink: open field behavior in alcohol-preferring and-nonpreferring rat strains.

作者信息

Badishtov B A, Overstreet D H, Kashevskaya O P, Viglinskaya I V, Kampov-Polevoy A B, Seredenin S B, Halikas J A

机构信息

Institute for Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1995 Mar;57(3):585-9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00299-k.

DOI:10.1016/0031-9384(94)00299-k
PMID:7753899
Abstract

High open field activity has been associated with high alcohol intake in inbred mouse strains. The present study sought to determine if a similar relationship might exist in rats. Strains which voluntarily drink large amounts of alcohol (alcohol-preferring [P], alcohol-accepting [AA], Fawn-Hooded [FH]) or little or no alcohol (alcohol-nonpreferring [NP], alcohol-nonaccepting [ANA], Flinders Resistant Line [FRL]) were compared with the Maudsley strains of rats selectively bred for differences in open field defecation and activity. There were highly significant strain differences in open field activity, with the alcohol-preferring P rats exhibiting the highest activity and the alcohol-nonpreferring Maudsley Reactive rats exhibiting the lowest. However, the NP rats were almost as active as the P rats and the AA and ANA rats exhibited intermediate levels of activity which did not differ from each other. Thus, there was no consistent relationship between open field activity and high voluntary alcohol intake. Defecation was highest in the Maudsley Reactive rats, and there was a consistent negative relationship with alcohol intake (r = -0.455 across all strains). In a population of 57 FHxFRL F2 hybrids, there were no significant correlations between alcohol intake and open field activity (r = -0.01) or defecation (r = +0.12). We conclude, therefore, that there was no consistent relationship between voluntary alcohol intake and open field behavior across strains of rats.

摘要

在近交系小鼠品系中,旷场活动量高与酒精摄入量高有关。本研究旨在确定大鼠中是否可能存在类似关系。将自愿大量饮酒的品系(嗜酒[P]、接受酒精[AA]、淡褐色带帽[FH])或少量饮酒或不饮酒的品系(不嗜酒[NP]、不接受酒精[ANA]、弗林德斯抗性系[FRL])与因旷场排便和活动差异而选择性培育的莫兹利大鼠品系进行比较。旷场活动存在高度显著的品系差异,嗜酒的P大鼠活动量最高,不嗜酒的莫兹利反应性大鼠活动量最低。然而,NP大鼠的活动量几乎与P大鼠相同,AA和ANA大鼠的活动量处于中间水平,彼此无差异。因此,旷场活动与高自愿酒精摄入量之间没有一致的关系。莫兹利反应性大鼠的排便量最高,且与酒精摄入量呈一致的负相关(所有品系的r = -0.455)。在57只FHxFRL F2杂交种群体中,酒精摄入量与旷场活动(r = -0.01)或排便(r = +0.12)之间无显著相关性。因此,我们得出结论,大鼠品系间自愿酒精摄入量与旷场行为之间没有一致的关系。

相似文献

1
To drink or not to drink: open field behavior in alcohol-preferring and-nonpreferring rat strains.喝还是不喝:酒精偏好和非偏好大鼠品系的旷场行为
Physiol Behav. 1995 Mar;57(3):585-9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00299-k.
2
To drink or not to drink: tests of anxiety and immobility in alcohol-preferring and alcohol-nonpreferring rat strains.喝还是不喝:对嗜酒和不嗜酒大鼠品系的焦虑和不动性测试
Physiol Behav. 1995 May;57(5):937-41. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00368-f.
3
Ultrasonic vocalization behavior differs between lines of ethanol-preferring and nonpreferring rats.在偏好乙醇和不偏好乙醇的大鼠品系之间,超声波发声行为存在差异。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997 Oct;21(7):1232-40.
4
Pain sensitivity and saccharin intake in alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rat strains.酒精偏好和非偏好大鼠品系的疼痛敏感性与糖精摄入量
Physiol Behav. 1996 Apr-May;59(4-5):683-8. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02110-8.
5
Behavioral similarities and differences among alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats: confirmation by factor analysis and extension to additional groups.嗜酒大鼠与非嗜酒大鼠之间行为的异同:通过因子分析证实并扩展至其他组别
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1997 Aug;21(5):840-8.
6
Saccharin intake predicts ethanol intake in genetically heterogeneous rats as well as different rat strains.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993 Apr;17(2):366-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00777.x.
7
Behavioural features of alcohol-preferring rats: focus on inbred strains.嗜酒大鼠的行为特征:聚焦于近交系
Alcohol Alcohol. 1999 May-Jun;34(3):378-85. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/34.3.378.
8
Analysis of alcohol-related phenotypes in F2 progeny derived from FH/Wjd and ACI/N rat strains reveals independent measures and sex differences.对源自FH/Wjd和ACI/N大鼠品系的F2后代中与酒精相关的表型进行分析,揭示了独立的测量指标和性别差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Feb 12;177(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.008. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
9
Reduced 5-HT3 receptor binding and lower baseline plus maze anxiety in the alcohol-preferring inbred fawn-hooded rat.在酒精偏好近交系淡色有帽大鼠中,5-羟色胺3型受体结合减少以及基线加迷宫焦虑降低。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Feb;77(2):281-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2003.11.015.
10
Comparison of alcohol-preferring and nonpreferring selectively bred rat lines. II. Operant self-administration in a continuous-access situation.嗜酒与非嗜酒选择性培育大鼠品系的比较。II. 连续获取情况下的操作性自我给药
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Dec;22(9):2147-58.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral Profiles of Adolescent Alcohol-Preferring/Non-preferring (P/NP) and High/Low Alcohol-Drinking (HAD/LAD) Rats Are Dependent on Line but Not Sex.青春期偏好酒精/不偏好酒精(P/NP)和高饮酒量/低饮酒量(HAD/LAD)大鼠的行为特征取决于品系而非性别。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 13;15:811401. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.811401. eCollection 2021.
2
Administration of a putative pro-dopamine regulator, a neuronutrient, mitigates alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats.给予一种假定的多巴胺前体调节剂,一种神经营养素,可以减轻酒精偏好大鼠的酒精摄入量。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 May 15;385:112563. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112563. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
3
Affect-related behaviors in mice selectively bred for high and low voluntary alcohol consumption.
高、低自发饮酒品系小鼠的与情感相关的行为。
Behav Genet. 2012 Mar;42(2):313-22. doi: 10.1007/s10519-011-9505-y. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
4
Behavioral profiling of multiple pairs of rats selectively bred for high and low alcohol intake using the MCSF test.采用 MCSF 测试对高、低酒精摄入量的大鼠进行多对选择繁殖的行为分析。
Addict Biol. 2012 Jan;17(1):33-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00327.x. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
5
Long-term behavioral effects of repetitive pain in neonatal rat pups.新生大鼠幼崽重复性疼痛的长期行为影响。
Physiol Behav. 1999 Jun;66(4):627-37. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00338-2.