• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蕨菜基本概念量表与差异能力量表在学前儿童风险样本中的关系。

Relationship between the Bracken Basic Concept Scale and the Differential Ability Scales with an at-risk sample of preschoolers.

作者信息

McIntosh D E, Brown M L, Ross S L

机构信息

Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri-Columbia 65211, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 1995 Feb;76(1):219-24. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.219.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.219
PMID:7770571
Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between the Bracken Basic Concept Scale and the Differential Ability Scales with 35 at-risk preschoolers between the ages 3-6 and 5-11. A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient of .70 was obtained between the Bracken Basic Concept Scale Total Test scores and the General Conceptual Ability scores of the Differential Ability Scales. This association supports the use of the Bracken scale to predict intelligence if replicated with a larger sample and specific handicaps. In addition, support for the administration of the more brief Bracken School Readiness Composite compared to using the Bracken Total Test score in the prediction of the Differential Ability Scales General Conceptual Ability score was found.

摘要

本研究调查了布雷肯基本概念量表与鉴别能力量表之间的关系,研究对象为35名年龄在3至6岁以及5至11岁的高危学龄前儿童。布雷肯基本概念量表总测试分数与鉴别能力量表的一般概念能力分数之间的皮尔逊积差相关系数为0.70。如果能在更大样本和特定残疾群体中重复该研究,这种关联将支持使用布雷肯量表来预测智力。此外,研究发现,相比于使用布雷肯总测试分数,在预测鉴别能力量表的一般概念能力分数时,使用更简短的布雷肯入学准备综合量表更具优势。

相似文献

1
Relationship between the Bracken Basic Concept Scale and the Differential Ability Scales with an at-risk sample of preschoolers.蕨菜基本概念量表与差异能力量表在学前儿童风险样本中的关系。
Psychol Rep. 1995 Feb;76(1):219-24. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.219.
2
Comparison of Kaufman's short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales--Fourth Edition.考夫曼儿童能力量表简版与斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版的比较
Percept Mot Skills. 1992 Jun;74(3 Pt 2):1120-2. doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.74.3c.1120.
3
Long-term predictive validity of the Miller assessment for preschoolers.《米勒学龄前儿童评估的长期预测效度》
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Jun;94(3 Pt 1):921-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.94.3.921.
4
The Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration--3R and teachers' ratings of written language.视觉运动整合发育测试——第3版及教师对书面语言的评分
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 2):371-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.371.
5
Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.使用韦氏学前和小学儿童智力量表修订版(WPPSI--R)和斯坦福-比奈智力量表L-M对有风险的学龄前儿童进行评估。
Psychol Rep. 1992 Oct;71(2):659-64. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.2.659.
6
The role of the teacher in identifying learning disabilities: a study using the McCarney Learning Disability Evaluation Scale (LDES).教师在识别学习障碍中的作用:一项使用 McCarney 学习障碍评估量表(LDES)的研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):483-93. doi: 10.1177/0022219409335217. Epub 2009 May 20.
7
Test of the definition of learning disability based on the difference between IQ and achievement.基于智商与学业成绩差异的学习障碍定义测试。
Psychol Rep. 2005 Aug;97(1):109-16. doi: 10.2466/pr0.97.1.109-116.
8
Relations among scores on Matrix Analogies Test, Draw-A-Person, and the Iowa Tests of basic skills for low socioeconomic children.社会经济地位较低儿童在矩阵类比测试、画人测试和衣阿华基本技能测试中的得分之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 1991 Aug;69(1):299-302. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.299.
9
Students Perception of Ability Scale: comparison of scores for gifted, average, and learning disabled students.学生能力感知量表:资优、普通和学习障碍学生得分比较
Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Aug;63(1):57-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1986.63.1.57.
10
Performance of students with learning disabilities on validity indexes of the Perception of Ability Scale for Students.学习障碍学生在《学生能力感知量表》效度指标上的表现。
Percept Mot Skills. 1992 Aug;75(1):27-34. doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.75.1.27.