Hannuksela A, Hannuksela M
Department of Dermatology, University of Oulu, Finland.
Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Mar;32(3):163-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00808.x.
Irritant properties of detergents can be tested by using patch and chamber tests and various kinds of use tests. The aim of the present study was to compare the results of use and 12 mm Finn Chamber tests. Study subjects (10 atopic and 11 non-atopic medical students) washed the outer aspect of 1 upper arm with liquid detergent for 1 minute 2 x daily for 1 week. 48-h chamber test with 5 concentrations of the same detergent in water were concurrently applied to upper back skin. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), electrical capacitance and skin blood flow were measured to quantify reactions on days 0, 2, 5 and 7. Irritant contact dermatitis developed equally in atopics and non-atopics in the wash test, whereas in the chamber test with a 10% aq. solution of the detergent, increase in TEWL was significantly higher in atopics than in non-atopics. The chamber test results thus predicted poorly the result of the wash test. This might indicate that the wash test and the chamber test measure different aspects of skin barrier function.
洗涤剂的刺激性可通过斑贴试验、腔室试验及各类使用试验来检测。本研究旨在比较使用试验与12毫米芬兰腔室试验的结果。研究对象(10名特应性和11名非特应性医学生)每天用液体洗涤剂清洗一侧上臂外侧1分钟,每天2次,共1周。同时,将5种浓度的同一种洗涤剂水溶液在上背部皮肤进行48小时腔室试验。在第0、2、5和7天测量经表皮水分流失(TEWL)、电容和皮肤血流量,以量化反应情况。在洗涤试验中,特应性和非特应性个体发生刺激性接触性皮炎的情况相同,而在使用10%洗涤剂水溶液的腔室试验中,特应性个体的TEWL增加明显高于非特应性个体。因此,腔室试验结果对洗涤试验结果的预测性较差。这可能表明洗涤试验和腔室试验测量的是皮肤屏障功能的不同方面。