Sassoon C S, Gruer S E
Pulmonary and Critical Care Section, UCI-Long Beach Medical Program, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA 90822, USA.
Intensive Care Med. 1995 Feb;21(2):159-68. doi: 10.1007/BF01726540.
Pressure- and flow-triggering are available in the Puritan Bennett 7200ae and Siemens SV 300. Using a mechanical lung model, we described the characteristics of the pressure- and flow-triggered continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of both ventilators. In the Puritan Bennett 7200ae, the pressure-triggered CPAP is characterized by the relatively insufficient flow delivery after the triggering, resulting in a greater lung pressure-time product (total PTP) than the flow-triggered CPAP. Pressure support of 5 cmH2O results in total PTP less than that with flow-triggered CPAP. In the Siemens SV 300, total PTP with pressure- or flow-triggered CPAP is comparable. Total PTP is less with pressure- or flow-triggered CPAP of the Siemens SV 300 than that of the Puritan Bennett 7200ae, respectively. The application of small pressure- or flow-triggered pressure support in the Puritan Bennett 7200ae eliminates the difference. The impact of these differences on patient inspiratory muscle work remains to be determined.
伟康7200ae呼吸机和西门子SV 300呼吸机具备压力触发和流量触发功能。我们使用机械肺模型描述了这两种呼吸机的压力触发和流量触发持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的特点。在伟康7200ae呼吸机中,压力触发CPAP的特点是触发后气流输送相对不足,导致肺压力-时间乘积(总PTP)大于流量触发CPAP。5 cmH2O的压力支持导致总PTP小于流量触发CPAP。在西门子SV 300呼吸机中,压力触发或流量触发CPAP的总PTP相当。西门子SV 300呼吸机压力触发或流量触发CPAP的总PTP分别小于伟康7200ae呼吸机。在伟康7200ae呼吸机中应用小幅度压力触发或流量触发压力支持可消除差异。这些差异对患者吸气肌做功的影响尚待确定。