Tennen H, Hall J A, Affleck G
Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 May;68(5):870-84; discussion 885-91. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.870.
Personality and social psychological studies of depression and depressive phenomena have become more methodologically sophisticated in recent years. In response to earlier problems in this literature, investigators have formulated sound suggestions for research designs. Studies of depression published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) between 1988 and 1993 were reviewed to evaluate how well these recommendations have been followed. Forty-one articles were examined for adherence to 3 suggestions appearing consistently in the literature: (a) multiple assessment periods, (b) multiple assessment methods, and (c) appropriate comparison groups. The studies published in JPSP have not adhered well to these standards. The authors recommend resetting minimum methodological criteria for studies of depression published in the premier journal in personality and social psychology.
近年来,关于抑郁症及抑郁现象的人格与社会心理学研究在方法上变得更加成熟。针对该领域早期文献中存在的问题,研究人员为研究设计提出了合理建议。对1988年至1993年间发表在《人格与社会心理学杂志》(JPSP)上的抑郁症研究进行了综述,以评估这些建议的遵循情况。审查了41篇文章,看其是否遵循文献中一直出现的3条建议:(a)多个评估期,(b)多种评估方法,以及(c)适当的对照组。发表在JPSP上的研究并未很好地遵循这些标准。作者建议为人格与社会心理学领域顶级期刊上发表的抑郁症研究重新设定最低方法标准。