• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Reliability of observer ratings in the assessment of personality disorders: a preliminary study.

作者信息

Coolidge F L, Burns E M, Mooney J A

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs 80933-7150, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):22-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<22::aid-jclp2270510105>3.0.co;2-9.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<22::aid-jclp2270510105>3.0.co;2-9
PMID:7782470
Abstract

A 200-item, self-report personality disorder inventory (Coolidge Axis II Inventory; CATI) was administered to 52 married target subjects. Their spouses and a close friend completed a significant-other form about the targets. The mean correlation across all personality disorder scales was .51 for the targets-spouses, .36 for the targets-friends, and .41 for the spouses-friends. Twenty-eight target-spouse correlations were significant and ranged from .99 to -.40. The mean correlation for the individual 13 personality disorder scales was .46 for target-spouses and ranged from .63 for the histrionic scale to .27 for the paranoid scale. The results were interpreted as establishing a basis for significant other assessment of personality disorders.

摘要

相似文献

1
Reliability of observer ratings in the assessment of personality disorders: a preliminary study.
J Clin Psychol. 1995 Jan;51(1):22-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199501)51:1<22::aid-jclp2270510105>3.0.co;2-9.
2
Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory: a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.《柯立芝轴II量表的信效度:一种用于评估人格障碍的新量表》
J Pers Assess. 1992 Oct;59(2):223-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5902_1.
3
Comorbidity of DSM-IV personality disorders in a nonclinical sample.非临床样本中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的共病情况。
J Clin Psychol. 1998 Oct;54(6):773-80. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199810)54:6<773::aid-jclp3>3.0.co;2-i.
4
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
5
DSM-III-R narcissistic personality disorder evaluated by patients' and informants' self-report questionnaires: relationships with other personality disorders and a sense of entitlement as an indicator of narcissism.通过患者和 informant 的自我报告问卷评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》中的自恋型人格障碍:与其他人格障碍的关系以及作为自恋指标的权利感。 注:这里“informant”不太明确具体准确对应中文的什么词,可根据具体语境调整,比如“提供信息者”等 。
Compr Psychiatry. 1992 Nov-Dec;33(6):397-406. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90062-u.
6
A normative study of the Coolidge axis-II inventory, short form.库里奇第二轴量表简版的规范性研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2007 Sep;80(Pt 3):437-41. doi: 10.1348/147608306X154825.
7
Personality disorder and self-report questionnaire.人格障碍与自我报告问卷
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;162:265-6. doi: 10.1192/s0007125000180195.
8
Comparative validity of MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder classifications.明尼苏达多项人格调查表-2(MMPI-2)与米隆临床多轴问卷-Ⅱ(MCMI-Ⅱ)人格障碍分类的比较效度
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):569-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_7.
9
Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI.使用SWAP-200和PAI对人格障碍进行临床医生评估与自我评估之间的关系。
Psychol Assess. 2007 Jun;19(2):225-9. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.225.
10
Structure of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory Personality Disorder Scales from the five-factor model perspective.从五因素模型视角看柯立芝轴II人格障碍量表的结构。
Psychol Rep. 1998 Dec;83(3 Pt 1):947-52. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3.947.

引用本文的文献

1
CONVERGENCE OF DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY SYMPTOMS IN FRIENDSHIP DYADS.友谊二元组中抑郁和焦虑症状的趋同
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec 1;32(10):1061-1074. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2013.32.10.1061.
2
Self- and informant-reported perspectives on symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder.自我报告和知情者报告的自恋型人格障碍症状观点。
Personal Disord. 2012 Apr;3(2):140-54. doi: 10.1037/a0026576. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
Level of agreement between self and spouse in the assessment of personality pathology.在评估人格障碍方面,自己与配偶的一致性程度。
Assessment. 2011 Jun;18(2):217-26. doi: 10.1177/1073191110394772. Epub 2011 Jan 10.