Güell R, Casan P, Sangenís M, Santís J, Morante F, Borras J M, Guyatt G
Departament de Pneumologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Arch Bronconeumol. 1995 May;31(5):202-10. doi: 10.1016/s0300-2896(15)30925-x.
The Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ), proposed by Guyatt et al, is a specific instrument used to assess quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our aim was to translate the questionnaire and validate it so that it could then be used as a measurement instrument in programs of respiratory rehabilitation. Sixty-five patients with COPD who were candidates for breathing therapy were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 64 +/- 7 years and all had severe air flow limitation, with FEV1 33 +/- 13% over reference values but not respiratory failure (pO2 70 +/- 10 mmHg). The questionnaire was subjected to a process of translation/back translation and disagreements over wording were discussed by a panel of bilingual speakers and the author himself. The validation process involved the following steps: 1) a comprehension study with a group of 5 patients, which revealed no special difficulties; 2) analysis of internal consistency or reliability by way of Crombach's alpha coefficient, which gave and overall score of 0.92 and area scores of 0.51 for dyspnea, 0.8 for fatigue, 0.86 for emotional factors and 0.84 for disease control, and 3) analysis of correlation between various lung function parameters and exercise test results (6 min of increasing effort and a stationary cycle), which showed weak but statistically significant correlations that were comparable to those found by the author of the original CRDQ.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
盖亚特等人提出的慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(CRDQ)是一种用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者生活质量的特定工具。我们的目的是翻译该问卷并进行验证,以便将其用作呼吸康复项目中的测量工具。65名有呼吸治疗需求的COPD患者参与了该研究。平均年龄为64±7岁,所有患者均有严重气流受限,第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)比参考值低33±13%,但无呼吸衰竭(动脉血氧分压70±10 mmHg)。问卷经过了翻译/回译过程,双语专家小组和作者本人讨论了措辞上的分歧。验证过程包括以下步骤:1)对一组5名患者进行理解性研究,结果显示无特殊困难;2)通过克朗巴赫α系数分析内部一致性或可靠性,总体得分为0.92,呼吸困难方面得分为0.51,疲劳方面得分为0.8,情绪因素方面得分为0.86,疾病控制方面得分为0.84;3)分析各种肺功能参数与运动测试结果(6分钟递增负荷运动和固定自行车运动)之间的相关性,结果显示相关性较弱但具有统计学意义,与原始CRDQ的作者所发现的结果相当。(摘要截断于250字)