Tiballi R N, He X, Zarins L T, Revankar S G, Kauffman C A
Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):915-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.915-917.1995.
We examined the reliability and accuracy of a colorimetric assay using Alamar Blue reagent in the performance of susceptibility tests for Candida albicans. We compared the broth macrodilution method recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) with a macrodilution method modified with the Alamar reagent and a microdilution method modified with the Alamar reagent. The MICs of fluconazole and itraconazole for 97 isolates of C. albicans and 3 control isolates were tested. For fluconazole, the Alamar-modified broth macrodilution method yielded 94% (91 of 97) concordance within 2 dilutions compared with the NCCLS method, while the microdilution method yielded 95% (92 of 97) concordance. With Alamar-modified methods for itraconazole, broth macrodilution yielded 97% (94 of 97) concordance within 2 dilutions. MICs obtained by the microdilution method, although tightly nested, were shifted to a higher value when compared with those obtained by the NCCLS method; there was only 77% (75 of 97) concordance within 2 dilutions but 97% concordance (94 of 97) within 3 dilutions. Tests by all methods with quality control strains showed excellent reproducibilities. For fluconazole, the methods modified with the Alamar reagent yielded clear endpoints and excellent correlation for the broth macrodilution and microdilution methods. For itraconazole, the methods modified with the Alamar reagent yielded clear endpoints and were reproducible, but higher MICs were obtained by the microdilution methods compared with those obtained by the NCCLS methods.
我们检测了使用阿拉玛蓝试剂的比色测定法在白色念珠菌药敏试验中的可靠性和准确性。我们将美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)推荐的肉汤宏稀释法与用阿拉玛试剂改良的宏稀释法以及用阿拉玛试剂改良的微量稀释法进行了比较。对97株白色念珠菌分离株和3株对照分离株进行了氟康唑和伊曲康唑的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)检测。对于氟康唑,与NCCLS方法相比,用阿拉玛改良的肉汤宏稀释法在2倍稀释范围内一致性为94%(97株中的91株),而微量稀释法一致性为95%(97株中的92株)。对于伊曲康唑,用阿拉玛改良的方法,肉汤宏稀释法在2倍稀释范围内一致性为97%(97株中的94株)。微量稀释法获得的MIC值虽然紧密嵌套,但与NCCLS方法获得的值相比向更高值偏移;在2倍稀释范围内一致性仅为77%(97株中的75株),但在3倍稀释范围内一致性为97%(97株中的94株)。用所有方法对质控菌株进行的检测均显示出极好的重复性。对于氟康唑,用阿拉玛试剂改良的方法在肉汤宏稀释法和微量稀释法中均产生了清晰的终点和极好的相关性。对于伊曲康唑,用阿拉玛试剂改良的方法产生了清晰的终点且可重复,但微量稀释法获得的MIC值比NCCLS方法获得的更高。