Suppr超能文献

用于检测粗球孢子菌抗体的市售酶免疫测定法与传统血清学检测方法的比较。

Comparison of commercially available enzyme immunoassay with traditional serological tests for detection of antibodies to Coccidioides immitis.

作者信息

Martins T B, Jaskowski T D, Mouritsen C L, Hill H R

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):940-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.940-943.1995.

Abstract

A newly released commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was evaluated for its ability to detect immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies against the tube precipitin and complement fixation (CF) antigens of Coccidioides immitis. The ELISA was compared with more traditional diagnostic assays, CF, latex agglutination (LA), and immunodiffusion (ID). When the IgM-specific portion of the ELISA was compared with LA, there was an agreement of 81.8%, a specificity of 75.0%, and a sensitivity of 84.6%. For the determination of the presence of IgG antibodies, the results of the IgG-specific part of the ELISA were compared with the combined results of ID and CF. After resolution of discrepant results, there was an agreement of 95.6%, a specificity of 98.3%, and a sensitivity of 92.6%. When the results of the IgG- and IgM-specific portions of the ELISA combined were compared with the results of the three traditional assays (CF, LA, and ID) there was an agreement of 96.7%, a specificity of 98.5%, and a sensitivity of 94.8%. The ELISA proved to be a reliable assay for the detection of antibodies against the tube precipitin and CF antigens and did not suffer from the objectivity required to interpret the results of the traditional assays and anticomplement interference associated with the traditional assays.

摘要

对一种新发布的商用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)进行了评估,以检测其针对粗球孢子菌试管沉淀素和补体结合(CF)抗原的免疫球蛋白M(IgM)和IgG抗体的能力。将ELISA与更传统的诊断方法CF、乳胶凝集试验(LA)和免疫扩散试验(ID)进行了比较。当将ELISA的IgM特异性部分与LA进行比较时,一致性为81.8%,特异性为75.0%,灵敏度为84.6%。对于IgG抗体存在情况的测定,将ELISA的IgG特异性部分的结果与ID和CF的综合结果进行了比较。在解决不一致结果后,一致性为95.6%,特异性为98.3%,灵敏度为92.6%。当将ELISA的IgG和IgM特异性部分的综合结果与三种传统方法(CF、LA和ID)的结果进行比较时,一致性为96.7%,特异性为98.5%,灵敏度为94.8%。ELISA被证明是一种可靠的检测针对试管沉淀素和CF抗原抗体的方法,不存在传统方法解读结果所需的主观性以及与传统方法相关的抗补体干扰问题。

相似文献

9
[Laboratory methods in the diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis].[球孢子菌病诊断中的实验室方法]
Rev Chilena Infectol. 2014 Jun;31(3):293-7. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182014000300007.

引用本文的文献

5
Valley fever, mimicker of malignancy.谷热,恶性肿瘤的模仿者。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 10;9(1):e12900. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12900. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Diagnosis of Pulmonary Infections Due to Endemic Fungi.地方性真菌引起的肺部感染的诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 10;11(5):856. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050856.

本文引用的文献

1
Pattern of 39,500 serologic tests in coccidioidomycosis.39500例球孢子菌病血清学检测模式
J Am Med Assoc. 1956 Feb 18;160(7):546-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.1956.02960420026008.
4
Coccidioidomycosis.球孢子菌病
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May;8(5):466-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01964061.
5
Serology of coccidioidomycosis.球孢子菌病的血清学
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jul;3(3):247-68. doi: 10.1128/CMR.3.3.247.
6
Coccidioidomycosis. Part I.球孢子菌病。第一部分。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 Mar;117(3):559-85. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.117.3.559.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验