• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study.

作者信息

Sparks P, Shepherd R

机构信息

Institute of Food Research, Reading, UK.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 1994 Oct;14(5):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00291.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00291.x
PMID:7800864
Abstract

Although public perceptions of food-related hazards receive much media comment and debate, the research literature on such perceptions is sparse and piecemeal. In the reported study, 216 people completed a questionnaire relating to their perceptions of the "risk characteristics" of potential hazards associated with various aspects of food production and food consumption. Responses were examined via principal-components analysis to obtain a structural representation of risk perception of the kind provided by Fischhoff, Slovic, and their colleagues in their seminal psychometric work. A three-component solution accounting for 87% of the variance was obtained, with the dimensions labeled as "severity," "unknown," and "number of people exposed." The findings also yielded information pointing to evidence of the phenomenon of unrealistic optimism. We conclude that our findings offer a useful base upon which further in-depth research integrating different perspectives on risk perception with respect to food-related hazards may be developed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study.
Risk Anal. 1994 Oct;14(5):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00291.x.
2
Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: a psychometric study.公众对日常食物危害的认知:一项心理测量学研究。
Risk Anal. 1996 Aug;16(4):487-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01095.x.
3
Exploring the "psychometric paradigm": comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses.探索“心理测量范式”:总体分析与个体分析的比较
Risk Anal. 1997 Jun;17(3):303-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00868.x.
4
Methodological approaches to assessing risk perceptions associated with food-related hazards.评估与食品相关危害相关的风险认知的方法学途径。
Risk Anal. 1998 Feb;18(1):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00919.x.
5
Perceptions of risk and benefit of different foods consumed in Brazil and the optimism about chronic diseases.巴西人对不同食物的风险和益处的认知与对慢性病的乐观态度。
Food Res Int. 2021 May;143:110227. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110227. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Lay people's perception of food hazards: comparing aggregated data and individual data.非专业人士对食品危害的认知:汇总数据与个体数据的比较
Appetite. 2006 Nov;47(3):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
7
Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials.早期癌症试验中的控制感和不切实际的乐观主义。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Feb;44(2):121-127. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103724. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
8
Understanding the Cognitive and Affective Mechanisms that Underlie Proxy Risk Perceptions among Caregivers of Asthmatic Children.理解哮喘患儿照顾者代理风险感知的认知和情感机制。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jul;38(5):562-572. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18759933. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
9
Consumer trust in food safety--a multidisciplinary approach and empirical evidence from Taiwan.消费者对食品安全的信任——一种多学科方法及来自台湾的实证证据。
Risk Anal. 2008 Dec;28(6):1553-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01115.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
10
Developing a subject-derived terminology to describe perceptions of chemicals in foods.开发一种源自受试者的术语来描述对食品中化学物质的认知。
Risk Anal. 1996 Apr;16(2):133-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00772.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamics of risk perception altered by cognitive hazard typification: A case of naturalness and immediacy of effect in Japan.认知危害类型化改变风险认知的动态变化:以日本影响的自然性和即时性为例
Risk Anal. 2025 Sep;45(9):2580-2596. doi: 10.1111/risa.70036. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies.消费者对新型食品技术的接受度。
Nat Food. 2020 Jun;1(6):343-350. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
Impact of disease characteristics and knowledge on public risk perception of zoonoses.疾病特征和知识对人畜共患病公众风险感知的影响。
Biol Lett. 2022 Aug;18(8):20220148. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0148. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
4
Genetically modified food and consumer risk responsibility: The effect of regulatory design and risk type on cognitive information processing.转基因食品和消费者风险责任:监管设计和风险类型对认知信息处理的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0252580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252580. eCollection 2021.
5
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.风险沟通领域的技术援助。
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06574. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Food Safety Gaps between Consumers' Expectations and Perceptions: Development and Verification of a Gap-Assessment Tool.消费者期望与认知之间的食品安全差距:差距评估工具的开发与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(17):6328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176328.
7
When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies.当进化违背未来:厌恶感对接受新食品技术的贡献。
Risk Anal. 2019 Jul;39(7):1546-1559. doi: 10.1111/risa.13279. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Determinants of the willingness to participate in biobanking among Malaysian stakeholders in the Klang Valley.马来西亚吉隆坡谷地区利益相关者参与生物银行的意愿决定因素。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0619-2.
9
Multiple attribute decision making model and application to food safety risk evaluation.多属性决策模型及其在食品安全风险评估中的应用
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):e0189835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189835. eCollection 2017.
10
Risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in poultry husbandry by citizens, poultry farmers and poultry veterinarians.公民、家禽养殖户和家禽兽医对家禽养殖中公共卫生和食品安全危害的风险认知。
Poult Sci. 2018 Feb 1;97(2):607-619. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex325.