Aeres University of Applied Sciences Dronten, De Drieslag 4, 8251 JZ Dronten, the Netherlands.
Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Poult Sci. 2018 Feb 1;97(2):607-619. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex325.
Differences in risk perceptions of public health and food safety hazards in various poultry husbandry systems by various stakeholder groups, may affect the acceptability of those husbandry systems. Therefore, the objective was to gain insight into risk perceptions of citizens, poultry farmers, and poultry veterinarians regarding food safety and public health hazards in poultry husbandry systems, and into factors explaining these risk perceptions. We surveyed risk perceptions of Campylobacter contamination of broiler meat, avian influenza introduction in laying hens, and altered dioxin levels in eggs for the most commonly used broiler and laying hen husbandry systems in Dutch citizens (n = 2,259), poultry farmers (n = 100), and poultry veterinarians (n = 41). Citizens perceived the risks of the three hazards in the indoor systems higher and in the outdoor systems lower than did the professionals. Citizens reported higher concerns regarding aspects reflecting underlying psychological factors of risk perception compared to professionals. Professionals indicated a relatively low level of personal control, which might imply risk denial. Of the socio-demographic characteristics, gender and childhood residence were associated with risk perceptions. The influence of other factors of risks perception are discussed. It is suggested that risk perceptions of all stakeholder groups are influenced by affect, stigma, and underlying values. To adapt current or new husbandry systems that can count on societal support, views of key stakeholders and multiple aspects such as animal welfare, public health, food safety, and underlying values should be considered integrally. When trade-offs, such as between animal welfare and public health have to be made, insight into underlying values might help to find consensus among stakeholders.
不同利益相关群体对不同家禽养殖系统中公共卫生和食品安全危害的风险感知差异,可能会影响这些养殖系统的可接受性。因此,本研究旨在深入了解公民、家禽养殖户和家禽兽医对家禽养殖系统中食品安全和公共卫生危害的风险感知,以及解释这些风险感知的因素。我们调查了肉鸡肉中弯曲杆菌污染、产蛋鸡中禽流感引入以及鸡蛋中二恶英水平改变这三种危害在荷兰公民(n=2259)、家禽养殖户(n=100)和家禽兽医(n=41)中最常用的肉鸡和产蛋鸡养殖系统中的风险感知。与专业人员相比,公民认为室内系统中这三种危害的风险更高,而室外系统的风险则更低。与专业人员相比,公民报告了更高的与风险感知的潜在心理因素相关的担忧。专业人员表示,他们的个人控制水平相对较低,这可能意味着他们否认风险。在社会人口统计学特征中,性别和童年居住地与风险感知有关。讨论了其他风险感知因素的影响。研究表明,所有利益相关群体的风险感知都受到情感、污名和潜在价值观的影响。为了适应能够获得社会支持的现有或新的养殖系统,应该综合考虑关键利益相关者的观点以及动物福利、公共卫生、食品安全和潜在价值观等多个方面。当必须在动物福利和公共卫生之间做出权衡时,对潜在价值观的了解可能有助于利益相关者之间达成共识。