McEwen A W, Caldicott L D, Barker I
Department of Anaesthetics, Sheffield Children's Hospital.
Anaesthesia. 1994 Nov;49(11):987-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04320.x.
In this study parents' and anaesthetists' views were compared, by means of questionnaire, to assess the benefit of parental presence at induction. One hundred and ninety four unpremedicated children aged 1-16 years underwent daycase surgery. One hundred and eighty four parents accompanied their child and felt that their child benefited from this. Anaesthetists rated only 72% of parents as being helpful. Parents who had undergone anaesthesia in the past were less likely, 60% compared with 79% (p < 0.01), to consider themselves as upset than parents who had not. Thirty one percent (44/140) of anaesthetists, compared with 43% (60/140) of parents, felt the child was upset at induction (p < 0.01). Parents judging themselves to be upset at induction were significantly more likely to consider their child as upset (p < 0.01). Most parents feel that they are of help in the anaesthetic room regardless of whether or not they find it an upsetting experience. Ninety eight per cent would want to accompany their child in the future and we believe this should be allowed unless there are overriding considerations.
在本研究中，通过问卷调查比较了家长和麻醉医生对于诱导期家长陪伴益处的看法。194名年龄在1至16岁未使用术前药的儿童接受了日间手术。184名家长陪伴其孩子，他们觉得孩子从中受益。麻醉医生仅将72%的家长评为有帮助。过去接受过麻醉的家长认为自己心烦意乱的可能性较小，为60%，而未接受过麻醉的家长为79%（p<0.01）。31%（44/140）的麻醉医生认为孩子在诱导期心烦意乱，而家长的这一比例为43%（60/140）（p<0.01）。认为自己在诱导期心烦意乱的家长更有可能认为自己的孩子心烦意乱（p<0.01）。大多数家长认为，无论他们是否觉得这是一次令人心烦意乱的经历，他们在麻醉室都能起到帮助作用。98%的家长希望未来陪伴自己的孩子，我们认为除非有压倒性的考虑因素，否则应该允许这样做。
