Suppr超能文献

使用一种新的人格障碍评估量表观察到的DSM-III-R和ICD-10人格障碍中的“共病模式”

"Patterns of comorbidity" among DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders as observed with a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.

作者信息

Herpertz S, Steinmeyer E M, Sass H

机构信息

Psychiatrische Klinik, Medizinischen Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994;244(3):161-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02191892.

Abstract

Although DSM-III-R and ICD-10 suggest the assignment of multiple personality diagnoses, a high degree of overlap may be an indicator of insufficiently distinct and too inclusive types of personality. We studied this problem with a new inventory in an unselected clinical sample. The Aachen List of Items for the Registration of Personality Disorders (AMPS) integrates the different types of disordered personality according to DSM-III-R, ICD-10, and four subaffective categories, which largely follow the typologies of Kraepelin, K. Schneider, and Kretschmer. The prevalence rate of each personality disorder was calculated in a consecutive group of 231 patients. Patterns of comorbidity were computed using odds ratios. More than one personality disorder was found in 41% according to DSM-III-R. ICD-10 showed a significantly higher degree of overlap. Interesting comorbidity patterns are discussed in comparison with several North American studies. Results indicate that clear-cut categorical personality diagnoses are not likely to be set up.

摘要

尽管《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)都建议对多重人格进行诊断,但高度重叠可能表明人格类型不够清晰且过于宽泛。我们在一个未经挑选的临床样本中使用一份新的量表研究了这个问题。亚琛人格障碍登记条目清单(AMPS)根据DSM-III-R、ICD-10以及四个亚情感类别整合了不同类型的人格障碍,这四个亚情感类别很大程度上遵循了克雷佩林、K. 施奈德和克雷奇默的分类法。在连续的231名患者中计算了每种人格障碍的患病率。使用优势比计算共病模式。根据DSM-III-R,41%的患者存在不止一种人格障碍。ICD-10显示出明显更高的重叠程度。与几项北美研究相比,讨论了有趣的共病模式。结果表明不太可能确立明确的分类人格诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验