Suppr超能文献

技术报告:粪便提取物免疫测试结果可能极具误导性。

Technical report: results of immunological tests on faecal extracts are likely to be extremely misleading.

作者信息

Ferguson A, Humphreys K A, Croft N M

机构信息

University of Edinburgh Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Clin Exp Immunol. 1995 Jan;99(1):70-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1995.tb03474.x.

Abstract

Clinical investigation of gut immunity is difficult because of the need to study intestinal tissues or secretions directly. Others have reported that immunoglobulins, antibodies and cytokines can be detected in saline extracts of faeces. We have assessed the validity of this approach by measuring immunoglobulins, albumin, alpha 1-antitrypsin and isotype-specific antibodies in matched samples of faeces and whole gut lavage fluid. Results were compared as estimated output per day, and by using haemoglobin as a common reference substance. Samples were obtained from 10 patients with active inflammatory bowel disease and 10 with other benign GI diseases. For immunoglobulins, albumin and antibodies, the amount detected in faeces varied from < 0.01% to 35.5% (based on estimated daily output) and < 0.01% to 18.5% (based on haemoglobin) of the amount known to be produced in the gut from results of assays on whole gut lavage fluid (WGLF); there were significantly higher rates of recovery in faecal specimens from patients with active gut inflammation than from other patients. Detection rates and titres of specific antibody in faeces were even lower than those for immunoreactive IgA. These data indicate that immunological tests on saline extracts of faeces do not represent the true status of the gut humoral immune system, and such studies should be strongly discouraged.

摘要

由于需要直接研究肠道组织或分泌物,肠道免疫的临床研究存在困难。其他人报告称,粪便盐水提取物中可检测到免疫球蛋白、抗体和细胞因子。我们通过测量粪便和全肠道灌洗液匹配样本中的免疫球蛋白、白蛋白、α1-抗胰蛋白酶和同种型特异性抗体,评估了这种方法的有效性。结果以每日估计产量进行比较,并以血红蛋白作为共同参考物质。样本取自10例活动性炎症性肠病患者和10例其他良性胃肠道疾病患者。对于免疫球蛋白、白蛋白和抗体,粪便中检测到的量占全肠道灌洗液(WGLF)检测结果中已知肠道产生量的<0.01%至35.5%(基于每日估计产量)和<0.01%至18.5%(基于血红蛋白);活动性肠道炎症患者粪便标本中的回收率明显高于其他患者。粪便中特异性抗体的检出率和滴度甚至低于免疫反应性IgA。这些数据表明,对粪便盐水提取物进行免疫检测并不能代表肠道体液免疫系统的真实状态,应强烈反对进行此类研究。

相似文献

3
High intraluminal fluid flow increases intestinal IgA output.高腔内液流增加肠道IgA输出。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jul;35(7):726-31. doi: 10.1080/003655200750023390.
4
Immunoglobulin coating of faecal bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病中粪便细菌的免疫球蛋白包被
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jul;16(7):669-74. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000108346.41221.19.

引用本文的文献

2
The role of IgA in food allergy remains elusive-timing is everything?IgA在食物过敏中的作用仍不清楚——时机就是一切?
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Jun;151(6):1481-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.02.029. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

5
Immunoglobulin E in extracts of feces from children.儿童粪便提取物中的免疫球蛋白E
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1984;74(1):50-4. doi: 10.1159/000233515.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验